Articles & Videos

The Democratic National Committee’s embarrassing 2024 'autopsy,' finally published, didn’t even mention Gaza. Plus: is a Republican rebellion really brewing over Trump’s $1.776 billion slush fund?

The curious disappearance of the New Jersey representative has stretched past the 75-day mark, and the people are... weirded out.

A US oil embargo has significantly worsened conditions in Cuba, with some regions going days without power.

The following is a lightly edited transcript of the May 22 episode of the Daily Blast podcast. Listen to it here.Greg Sargent: This is The Daily Blast from The New Republic, produced and presented by the DSR Network. I’m your host, Greg Sargent.Donald Trump just got hit with an absolutely crushing poll from Fox News. Disapproval of Trump on the economy is at a new high, and his ratings on inflation are simply awful. This includes among Republicans. In that context, Trump’s rambling to reporters Thursday was revealing. He again urged Republicans to pass draconian voter suppression legislation, but he accidentally admitted that this is about preventing Democrats from winning elections. And on top of all that, Republicans are revolting against Trump in a fresh way. Things are really falling apart for him. Can we sustain this through election day?We’re talking to MS NOW opinion editor James Downie, who has a good piece laying out how Trump is hitting all kinds of historic lows. James, nice to have you on.James Downie: Great to be back.Sargent: So let’s start with Trump’s ramblings to reporters. He brought up the SAVE Act, which is a vile piece of voter suppression legislation that would probably disenfranchise millions of people, and then said that Democrats are trying to block it. Listen.Donald Trump (voiceover): The Democrats don’t want to pass. Now, I’ll tell you what, the Democrat voters do want to pass, 87 percent. But the Democrat politicians don’t want to pass. And the reason is they’d never be elected again. Because with their policy of open borders, transgender for everyone—I call it transgender mutilization of your children for everybody—men playing in women’s sports, all of the stuff that they do, high taxes. They want a tax hike …Sargent: It’s complete nonsense that Democratic voters want to pass the SAVE Act. But note how Trump openly says there that passing it would mean Democrats never win another election. He actually says straight out that his voter suppression bill would lead to one-party rule in the GOP’s favor and that this would be good. Your reaction to that, James?Downie: The clip practically speaks for itself. From the beginning of this presidency, but particularly in the last couple of months, we’ve seen, from the so-called weaponization fund to the arch to all sorts of efforts at self-enrichment, this is a man who more than ever wants to avoid accountability. And the only way to do that is to stay in power forever. The fact that he is pushing this SAVE Act—versus, say, a bill to help the economy or to bring down gas prices by ending the war with Iran—shows that he isn’t really interested in winning voters over in any sort of regular, normal way. He’d rather cheat and he’d rather rig the election. Sargent: Everything is about his monuments to himself and about preventing accountability for those things. That’s where we are.Literally everything Trump talks about, pretty much all the time, is the arch, the ballroom. Now he’s got this new $1.8 billion slush fund that he’s going to use to reward allies. That’s got to be lumped in with voter suppression as yet another way to try and corruptly rig the system.Downie: Absolutely. The slush fund can be seen as—and my colleague Zeeshan Aleem at MS NOW has written about this—not only rewarding past insurrection attempts, but a promise to people who are considering insurrection attempts in the future that this is a way you can get money, that there will be something there for you on the other side of it.Sargent: Totally. This week’s Fox News poll is really something else. Trump’s approval among registered voters on the economy is 29 percent; 71 percent disapprove. These numbers have risen substantially in recent months. James, this is looking like something pretty close to total collapse on the economy, wouldn’t you say?Downie: Absolutely. Not just on the economy, although that is the most outstanding number—but total collapse in general. You see a big movement, particularly on the economy, in the last two to three months as gas prices have spiked because of the Iran war. It’s brought down his opinion polls in general. We’re seeing more and more movement toward the mid-thirties or even low thirties that is traditionally the floor for any president. It takes a lot of effort to reach those numbers—a lot of almost deliberate incompetence.Sargent: I want to read a couple more numbers here. On foreign policy, he’s at 38 percent to 62 percent. On inflation, he’s at 24 percent to 76 percent. Seventy-six percent—that’s more than three-quarters of the country disapproving of his handling of the single most important issue to voters right now. He’s even crept underwater on border security as well, which was literally the one thing where he was staying above water. He’s now underwater on that as well. And this is in a Fox News poll. I was struck by the write-up. They always generally try to come up with some way to soft-pedal the findings—they say, Well, there’s this good finding for Trump. This was a harsh write-up by Fox News. They were pretty blunt that he’s in real trouble.Downie: Yeah. Even Fox News—there’s no way you can spin these numbers. And it’s not just Fox News. You have the New York Times/Siena poll that came out recently—minus 22, similar number for Trump. The polling averages are looking similar. Nate Silver has him at an average of minus 21. The New York Times polling average, similar number. G. Elliott Morris’s number—who I believe you’ve had as a guest on your show in the past—minus 24, and 60 percent disapproval on average, which is just a remarkable number. Just today we had the American Research Group poll, which was the first that I’ve seen that put Trump at 31 percent approval. Thirty-one percent. And yes, that’s just one poll, but even one poll at that number is a remarkably low reading for any president. Sargent: We are getting close to George W. Bush post–Katrina [and] Iraq numbers here. I want to bring up still more numbers in the Fox poll because they go a little more directly to what’s happening to MAGA. Trump’s approval has dropped to new lows among Republicans who don’t identify as MAGA: 54 percent. Among white voters, it’s dropped to 43 percent. And among rural voters, it’s dropped to 43 percent. Those are his approval numbers among those constituencies. And among independents, his approval is 24 percent—fewer than one in four in the country. To be barely above water among Republican voters who are non-MAGA and substantially underwater with whites and rural voters—that cuts deep into the coalition that elected Trump. That coalition is gone. It’s fallen apart.James, the whole story we’ve been told about Trump for years has been that he has this rock-solid floor because his base will never leave him. But now big swaths of it are leaving him. What do you make of that?Downie: The economy matters a lot. One story I like to tell is that historically, Herbert Hoover still got 35 percent of the vote in 1932 after four years of the Great Depression. But that was still a huge loss from his numbers in 1928. And the economy matters a lot to a lot of people, and the people sometimes who say that they’re now disapproving—maybe they’re not going to show up at the voting place and vote for the opposite party, but they might just not show up at all. So it can turn up in a number of different ways.More generally, Trump set himself up for this. He promised prices would come down on day one. He promised no more forever wars. He promised to a lot of voters that their lives would be sunshine and rainbows the moment he was back in office. Not only has it not happened, but he has been very publicly working against improving their lives and prioritizing things like the slush fund and his arch and his ballroom.Sargent: Well, James, do you think there’s actually an opportunity here for Democrats to start making real inroads with some of these constituencies that have been hard for them to reach? Here, we’re seeing the guts of the Trump coalition leave him. We’re talking about white voters, noncollege whites, rural voters, even rural whites. Men are turning against him. These obviously are constituencies that were terrible for Democrats in 2024—don’t have to get into why right now—but there’s actually an opportunity, with good candidates in the right places in some of these tough areas for Democrats like rural Pennsylvania, parts of Georgia, for them to actually start making the case to these constituencies that it’s time to give up on Trump and the Republican Party.Downie: Absolutely. The longer this economic pain goes on, the longer that gas is as high as it is, the longer that people continue to feel like they are either barely making it by or falling behind, the longer that inflation continues to outpace wages—which it did again, we now know that it did for the past year, and that’s the first time that’s happened since the middle of the worst of the Biden presidency inflation—the more chance that gives Democrats to make inroads in the Republican coalition. In 2024, as you said, not only did they do poorly with more traditional Republican constituencies that they would have hoped to make inroads in, but also they lost some things like younger voters, nonwhite voters, who they might have thought were part of their coalition. A lot of those voters either didn’t turn up or they voted Republican because of concerns about the economy. So the economy gives Democrats a real chance to now turn that around and to start making inroads in the Trump coalition.Sargent: Well, two more Fox News numbers, just because they go to the point that you just made. Among Hispanics, Donald Trump’s approval is 33 percent to 67 percent. That’s staggering. It’s clear that any gains that Trump made among Hispanics are just gone. Among working-class voters—meaning voters without a college degree—he’s at 40 percent approval to 60 percent. Again, the inroads he made with nonwhite working class—gone. This is a real opportunity, as you say, for Democrats to both start making inroads into some of these constituencies that have historically been tough for them and to repair the damage with these other constituencies that Donald Trump was able to take away from Democrats. Where do you see this going?The big story has been that Republicans are on offense because they’ve been able to redistrict now. They’ve been able to rig the elections in their favor, and they’re going to win. But numbers like these will just absolutely swamp any redistricting that Republicans have done.I don’t want to get too confident at all. Obviously, Democrats are going to have to win the popular vote probably by around three points at least right now. But it’s starting to look like that’s more than doable, because time is running out for them and Trump is tanking and he’s not turning it around. What do you think?Downie: Usually a gain of seven, eight, nine, 10 seats—however much Republicans end up netting in these gerrymandering efforts—that would make a big difference in an election.… Especially in a House election there’s a shrinking number of competitive seats anyway. But the numbers we’re seeing—the generic congressional ballot averages continue to widen. The Times had around plus 10. That would be well above what Democrats would need to flip the House. And the Senate is not something you can gerrymander. The Senate may be biased towards rural voters, but you can’t gerrymander it.In terms of how it plays out, for Democrats to really make inroads into this coalition—you see it in this Fox poll, but you see it in a lot of polls—even as Democrats do well on the congressional ballot and Trump struggles, there are a lot of voters who are not happy with the Democratic Party and don’t feel like the party is fighting hard enough for regular voters’ interests. Where that would tie in with what we’ve seen out of Washington this past week is that Republicans are realizing they can’t defend the corruption of the slush fund and the corruption behind the ballroom and things like that. I think that theme of corruption and of fighting against the big and powerful interests in Washington is going to be a winning message for Democrats. Some candidates like Jon Ossoff in Georgia have been moving on that message. I don’t think it’s a coincidence that Ossoff is now taking what many saw as might have been a toss-up race in the Georgia Senate contest—and now most people feel that Ossoff is pretty well on to keep it.Sargent: Which is really striking, because Donald Trump won Georgia in 2024. Biden had won it in 2020, but it sure looked like that was a temporary blip. Now it’s looking like maybe Democrats can continue to seriously contest it.To your point about the slush fund and Republicans turning against it, that is happening. The slush fund is actually being rejected by Republican senators, which is a rare thing. Punchbowl News reporter Andrew Desiderio reports that at a Senate GOP lunch on Thursday, two dozen senators objected to the fund. They now want to place restrictions on the fund in the reconciliation process. But it got even more interesting. According to this reporter, one GOP senator texted him, “Our majority is melting down before our eyes.”This is pretty remarkable stuff. The slush fund is a bit of an inside-D.C. story. I think not as vivid as the ballroom, with its powerful imagery of Trump destroying the East Wing of the White House to build an enormous Nero-like monument to himself. But Republicans are just at the end of their tether with this guy. They don’t want to be associated with the corrupt schemes anymore.Downie: Yeah, I think the slush fund—first of all, the name. The ease with which Democrats can just say, It’s an unregulated fund for Trump’s allies. It is very clearly a slush fund. It’s very easy to label. Also, we know January 6 was—thank goodness—not very popular, to say the least, with independent voters. That means that in any TV package or social media video about this fund, you’re going to have footage of January 6. Any ad—it’s going to be people breaking windows and hitting cops with flagpoles. I don’t think that’s going to poll very well.Sargent: There’s sort of a through line here, which is basically hubris. Donald Trump went out there earlier this week and stated straight out that his slush fund will go to insurrectionists. He said basically that that was the right thing to do because the insurrectionists were right. So he admitted that he’s using this slush fund full of taxpayer money to reward people who tried to violently overthrow an election on his behalf. He just admits it straight out. Here in this clip that we just heard, he’s admitting straight out that he wants to openly rig the system in order to instill entrenched one-party rule forever. There’s a level of hubris here that’s almost impossible to get your head around. But it’s looking like—I sure hope anyway—all the pieces are coming together for a truly epic repudiation. Don’t you think?Downie: I think so. Just going back to the polls—we’re used to thinking of Donald Trump as unpopular, and he has been an unpopular president throughout his entire terms. But no president has ever been this unpopular at this point in his term. Throughout the history of public opinion polling, no president has been this unpopular this early in a term. We’re entering uncharted territory. You’ve got more than two years to go and you’ve got a president whom fewer than two in five Americans support. And there’s no signs of it slowing down, especially while gas prices remain this high. So where do we go from here? It’s uncharted waters, to be frank.Sargent: Well, as Donald Trump himself would say, nobody has ever seen anything like these poll numbers. And as you say, we don’t know where it’s going to end up, but it’s sure looking good right now. James Downie, awesome to talk to you. Thanks for coming on.Downie: Thanks for having me.

It marks a reversal of a previous decision, but Europe is nonetheless bracing for a potential wider US troop drawdown.

The idea was flatly rejected by the US, suggesting that no immediate end to the war is in sight.

Ida Susser Adapted from The Yellow Vests and the Battle for Democracy:  Taking to the Streets of Paris in the 21st Century. In June 2019, a group of Yellow Vests, the diverse protest movement that broke out a year earlier, and their families set to work constructing a cabin on a holiday Saints Day. It […]

Gregory Shupak for FAIR Since October 2023, Israel has occupied vast stretches of territory in Gaza, Syria and, most recently, Lebanon. Corporate media have been reluctant to use clear, direct language to characterize US-backed Israeli land grabs in each of these places, preferring to describe Israel’s policies with euphemistic terminology. “Buffer” is chief among these. […]

In the Trumpian Age, Every Accusation Is Also a Confession Nick Turse Tom Dispatch “It’s got no anything,” President Donald Trump said of Somalia in a recent xenophobic rant. “All they do is run around shooting each other.” As is true of so much with this administration, every accusation is also a confession. U.S. troops have been […]