Publication

Current Affairs

Visit Current Affairs

Recent coverage

  • A Trillion Dollars Isn’t Worth It If You Have to Be Elon Musk

    “What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” — some homeless Palestinian Elon Musk is, at least on paper, the world’s first trillionaire. He reached that milestone on June 12, after SpaceX debuted as a publicly-traded company on the U.S. stock market at an initial offering of $150 per share. At the time of writing, that price has risen to about $185, taking Musk’s estimated net worth to $1.4 trillion as the company becomes bigger than Amazon. Depending on how you evaluate the historical Malian emperor Mansa Musa, Musk may be the richest person to ever live. Among pro-capitalist pundits, Musk’s ascension to trillionaire status has been the occasion for a round of sycophantic applause, as they all rush to tell us why it’s good for one individual to control this much of the world’s resources. At Fox News, we’re told that Musk “earned every penny,” and is living proof that “capitalism continues to reward individuals who create extraordinary value.” Similarly, an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times tells us that his SpaceX fortune is “a testament to human ingenuity, immigrant success and American greatness.” The National Review offers “Three Cheers For Elon Musk,” calling criticism of his hyper-wealth “revolting. Repulsive. Grotesque. Un-American.” Now, there are all kinds of political and economic reasons why these claims are wrong, and we’ve discussed them at some length elsewhere. Two of the most important are that by hoarding wealth, billionaires and now trillionaires are actively keeping other people in poverty, making the whole thing monstrously unethical, and that their vast fortunes allow them to buy political power and make a mockery of the word “democracy.” Both of these things are true of Musk, who has bragged about using his wealth to get Donald Trump elected and likely killed hundreds of thousands of people across Africa with his “DOGE” aid cuts. (If you start to count the lives Musk could save if he put his money to good use, the numbers get even more staggering.) But another, morbidly fascinating aspect of this whole moment is that, despite possessing wealth that rivals the emperors of the ancient world, Musk’s existence is a bizarre and cursed one in many important ways. His personal relationships with the people closest to him, by all appearances, are dysfunctional and abusive to varying degrees. He desperately wants to be adored by the public, but with every attempt, their approval slips further from his grasp. Instead of enjoying his money and leisure, he spends his waking hours obsessing over racist conspiracy theories and paranoid fantasies about the end of the world. And to add the final insult, he doesn’t evenhave a trillion dollars in any real sense; he just has to spend a lot of time and energy keeping up an elaborate fiction that he does. In a way, Musk’s fans are right: he’s a perfect example of capitalism at work, with its relentless drive for growth and acquisition at the expense of everything else. It’s just that those are terrible principles to base a human life on. You Can’t Buy Human Connection   It’s an old truism that money can’t buy the things that truly matter in life. This is only sort of the case. Money can certainly buy you a lot of the necessities that make it easier to be happy, like stable housing, leisure time, and better health, and research suggests that up until you hit about $100,000 per year in income, money can indeed improve your life satisfaction. But it’s also true that just because you’re wealthy, it doesn’t mean anyone will like you, especially if your money and status corrupt your ability to have healthy relations with other people. Elon Musk’s first wife, Justine Wilson, has recounted what it was like to be married to him, and it was about as unpleasant as you might expect. Musk was initially charming, but she says that there was a disturbing warning sign when he told her during a dance at their wedding reception that “I am the alpha in this relationship.” Unfortunately, she said, “the will to compete and dominate that made him so successful in business did not magically shut off when he came home,” and in their family “Elon's judgment overruled mine, and he was constantly remarking on the ways he found me lacking.” When she frequently reminded him that she was his wife, not an employee, he would apparently reply “If you were my employee I would fire you.” Despite their “dream lifestyle, privileged and surreal,” Musk was a terrible husband, and she felt “disposable.” Wilson told him she wanted “equality, partnership, and “to love and be loved.” He was unwilling to provide them, and told her in effect that “our status quo works for me, so it should work for you.” When she made clear that it didn’t, he divorced her the next day. Within weeks of filing for divorce in 2008, Musk was dating the much-younger British actress Talulah Riley. The two married, then divorced, then married again, then divorced again, and Musk’s second wife, like his first, felt “she had given up her own career, while he frequently abandoned her for his.” Perhaps the trillionaire’s most high-profile relationship has been with the musician Grimes, with whom he shares three children—X Æ A-Xii, Exa Dark Sideræl, and Techno Mechanicus. (To be fair, some of the blame for the naming may belong to Grimes, who now says she’s changed Exa Dark Siderael’s name to simply the letter “y” or a question mark, representing “the eternal question… and such.”) This relationship, too, ended badly, spilling out onto Twitter, with Grimes reporting that she had been going bankrupt in a massive custody battle with Musk. These are not Musk’s only children. The prolific breeder has at least 14 by various mothers. (Plus those to whom he gives his sperm away, whose numbers are unknown.) Musk has made it clear that he values quantity of procreative output over the quality of his relationships with his kids. Ever the student of history, he decided to populate the world with as many of his genetic offspring as possible, reportedly “after reading that Genghis Khan had done something similar.” (Good role model, Genghis Khan.) He is terrified of population decline, and “really wants smart people to have kids.” Musk appears to hold the pure genetic determinist view that what matters is not whether you’re involved with a child’s life but whether you have Good Smart Person Genes, which he believes he does. He also reportedly believes that “your wealth is directly linked to your IQ,” and so encouraged “all the rich men he knew” to reproduce. Unsurprisingly, Musk goes about this project in the creepiest way imaginable, sliding into women’s DMs on the social media platform he owns, Twitter/X. The Wall Street Journal reports that he replies to lesser-known users and “sometimes interacts through direct messages, some of whom he eventually solicits to have his babies.” Social media influencer Tiffany Fong, for instance, noticed that Musk “started liking and replying to her posts,” driving engagement and revenue to her account, and then “sent her a direct message asking if she was interested in having his child,” even though they had never met in person. Fong declined, and when Musk found out that she had told others about his offer, he chastised her and unfollowed her, leading her new earnings to evaporate. Musk has even preyed on women who have worked for him, with a former employee saying he “asked her on multiple occasions to have his babies.” Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and former project director at Tesla, testified in a court proceeding that Musk “was encouraging everyone around him at that time to have kids and he'd noticed I did not,” so he “offered to make a donation.” Zilis went on to have four of Musk’s children, and attained “special status” among the mothers of his “legion” (his name for his progeny) because he actually spends some time with her. Zilis has said that “I can’t possibly think of genes I would prefer for my children.” But note that she did not say “I can’t possibly think of a man I would prefer to raise my children with.” According to the Wall Street Journal, Zilis moved to “a compound in Austin where Musk imagined the women and his growing number of babies would all live among multiple residences,” although Grimes reportedly refused to move to the property. In 2022, Business Insider reported that Musk exposed himself to a flight attendant on his jet, rubbed her leg, and offered to buy her a horse if she would give him a hand job. (Note that many men do not have to offer to exchange horses for hand jobs, because there are women in the world willing to have sex with them for free, due to their winning personalities. Musk, lacking such an asset, must resort to equine bribery.) Tesla ended up paying the woman $250,000 to keep quiet about the incident. After the story broke, SpaceX employees posted “an internal letter protesting what they viewed as the company’s failure to take harassment allegations seriously,” after which eight of them were fired, leading them to file a complaint with the NLRB. It has to be said, this set of psychosexual preoccupations bears a striking resemblance to those of Musk’s fellow oligarch, the late Jeffrey Epstein. Musk seems to have a higher age preference, as all of the women he’s been publicly involved with have been over 18 (for instance, Riley was 22 and Musk was 37 when they began dating.) But like Musk, Epstein reportedly hoped to “seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women” on a large scale, and had a compound of his own at Zorro Ranch in New Mexico for that purpose. Like Musk, much of his harassment took place on a private plane, where the women in question were a captive audience. There are even emails between the two, sent on Christmas Day in 2013, where Musk rather pathetically begged to visit Epstein’s properties. The common denominator between the two men is treating women as things to acquire and collect, rather than people. It’s a form of perversity that’s really only available to the super-rich. Musk is an objectively terrible father to his “legion.” Many of his children he appears to have little interest in communicating with at all. When he was asked what was so great about having children, he said that kids were “delightful” but “struggled to come up with any other reasons that had anything to do with building a relationship with the children themselves.” Musk has ignored Grimes, who had pleaded to keep their son X out of the limelight and protect his privacy, instead dragging his toddler in front of TV cameras repeatedly. The worst example of Musk’s parenting, though, is his disavowal of his 22-year-old trans daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, whom he has publicly condemned, saying “she was ‘not a girl’ and was figuratively ‘dead,’” alleging that “he had been ‘tricked’ into authorizing trans-related medical treatment for her.” Musk’s transphobia is so extreme that he says he got into right-wing politics specifically because of Wilson, and his public attacks on her are even more galling given that when he comments negatively about someone online they tend to receive threats. For her part, Wilson says that her father “would harass her for exhibiting feminine traits,” on one trip “constantly yelling at me viciously because my voice was too high.” He was neglectful and absent, but also “cruel” and “cold” when present, “uncaring and narcissistic,” as well as “quick to anger.” (This is consistent with accounts of how Musk treats his employees as well.) Wilson notes that she doesn’t actually know exactly how many half-siblings she has, along with the extraordinary fact that “if I had a nickel for every time I found out I had half siblings through Reddit, I'd have two nickels... which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice, right?” The influencer Ashley St. Clair, who had one of Musk’s children in 2024, said that while Musk seemed “very normal” before she got pregnant, “it just got so f—king weird.” When the child was born, Musk requested to keep his name off the birth certificate, while one of his deputies pressured her “to sign documents keeping the father of the baby and details regarding her relationship with Musk secret in return for[…] a one-time fee of $15 million for a home and living expenses, plus an additional $100,000 a month until the baby turned 21.” But after St. Clair expressed support for Musk’s trans daughter, Musk said he was “filing for full custody today” because her “support for trans ideology meant that she was ‘implying she might transition a one-year-old boy.’” He also “sought a gag order in New York to force Ms. St. Clair to stop speaking publicly.” In other words, in addition to his cruel treatment of his trans daughter, he threatened to keep one of his other children from seeing their mom because St. Clair disavowed transphobia. Again, the theme of treating people as possessions returns, because Musk is interested in his children only if they turn out the way he prefers; otherwise, he’ll cast them aside as he might a defective rocket engine. Building a healthy, loving family, then, and building normal human relationships, are something Musk has no interest in, and likely couldn’t achieve even if he did. His vast wealth allows him to treat people like dirt and suffer few consequences. When the mother of one of his children displeases him, he can threaten to ruin her with a costly custody battle. When he is accused of sexual harassment, he can cut a check. But the end result of all of this is multiple failed marriages and an ever-growing brood of biological children who will lack any kind of meaningful parent-child relationship with their dad. You Can’t Buy Cool   If his relationships to the people close to him are a train wreck, Musk’s relationship with the public isn’t much better. As the years go on, it’s become clear that he badly wants to be seen as cool, funny, and popular, and yet the harder he tries to win everyone’s admiration, the less cool he becomes. Lately, his public antics just exude a desperate, sweaty energy that makes him painful to watch. There was the godawful “let that sink in” joke that he used to announce his arrival to Twitter’s headquarters, carrying a physical porcelain sink; the stupid X-shaped jumping jack he kept doing for a while, apparently to resemble the logo of “X the Everything App”; the cowboy hat incident; the photo he posted of his bedside table with a huge gun and four cans of Diet Coke on it; the poem (Maybe religion’s not so bad / To keep you from being sad). In his comprehensive, largely flattering biography, Walter Isaacson writes that Musk’s “jokes tended to be filled with smirking references to 69, other sex acts, body fluids, pooping, farts, dope smoking, and topics that would crack up a dorm room of stoned freshmen.” (More like a classroom of sixth-graders.) At one point, Musk admitted that he pays other people to play video games for him, so he’ll quickly get the highest scores and levels and Twitch streamers will see him as a “living god of video games.” For him, the point is not to enjoy the games, but to acquire whatever token or icon marks you as having won them, and thus earn the admiration of nerds who watch livestreams all day. And he couldn’t even get that, because when Musk attempted to stream himself playing Path of Exile 2last year, the audience trolled him relentlessly, posting “YOU HAVE NO REAL FRIENDS AND WILL DIE ALONE” over and over in the chat box. But just caring about this kind of thing in the first place is the pathetic part, and apparently no amount of money can fix that. In fact, the money itself may be the problem. Once you reach a certain level of wealth, if you’re not careful, you become surrounded by “yes men” who tell you everything you come up with is brilliant, no matter how non-brilliant it actually is. It’s a familiar pattern with American celebrities and financial elites. Howard Hughes had his mansion full of urine jars. Michael Jackson had his oxygen chamber and monkey, and his staff largely overlooked his questionable relations with children. Ye has his song where he rhymed “they don’t understand the things I say on Twitter” with “Heil Hitler.” (Notably, Musk and the artist formerly named Kanye West were friends for over a decade.) This is the kind of behavior where, if any non-rich person tried it, they’d be socially ostracized, sent for mental treatment, or at the very least told to shut up. But where an ordinary person might be considered “weird,” “creepy,” or “banned from the mall,” the rich are merely “eccentric,” and get to carry on making a spectacle of themselves indefinitely. The closest Musk ever came to being cool was in the early years, when he was still something of an underdog compared to the CEOs of the big aerospace and auto companies. Today, that’s gone, and his personal concept of “cool” is clearly just stuff he sees in video games, comic books, and YouTube and Reddit posts. To him, the height of “cool” is to pretend to be Iron Man, or post “epic memes” all day. It’s left him with a small, fanatical fanbase of similarly maladjusted internet guys, and he seems genuinely confused why everyone else in the world doesn’t love him, too. One person who is cool is Musk’s daughter, Vivian Wilson, who is a proud leftist and opponent of billionaires who has posed for Vogue and is fronting major fashion campaigns. Ashley St. Clair has even speculated that part of the reason Musk has attacked Wilson is “jealousy,” that he is “just mad that Vivian is a million times cooler than he will ever be.” Even a trillion dollars cannot make a bitter, reactionary, terminally-online middle-aged deadbeat dad cooler than his fashion icon trans daughter. You Can’t Buy Peace of Mind   Really, Musk doesn’t even seem to be enjoying his massive wealth that much. Many people, if they got hold of even a few million dollars—let alone a trillion—would be napping on a beach somewhere people have never heard of Twitter. Instead, Musk seems to spend a huge chunk of his free time on the app, responding to the most racist posts he can find. In that way, his life is not very different from that of the stereotypical, unemployed loser who lives in a basement and does the same, surrounded by empty Cheeto packets and Monster Energy cans. When you scroll through his feed, the sheer amount of racial fearmongering is overwhelming. Take just a few examples from this June. Here’s Musk saying that “there are large numbers of anti-White hate crimes every day in America,” in a reply to a far-right account called “End Wokeness.” Here he is complaining that “the system is severely biased against Whites,” in response to the news that a white 19-year-old had been sentenced to 19 years in a British prison for “attempting to behead a Kurdish barber with an axe.” On another occasion, he retweeted someone called “Rothmus” who said that “the welfare state has been more destructive to the black family than slavery.” (This is a particularly offensive bit of nonsense, as enslaved people routinely had their young children taken from them by force and sold at auction, while the welfare state does not do that.) More often, Musk simply responds with “concerning” or “!!” to any post that highlights a crime committed by a Black person or an immigrant, bringing it to the attention of his 240 million followers—and by extension the entire app, since he has reportedly instructed the software engineers to boost his posts, whether anyone wants to see them or not.   Just one of many, many examples.   The irony is that Musk is, by definition, one of the most powerful people in the world, and he’s visibly terrified of the least powerful. According to the Washington Post, Musk posted about “race and his concerns about perceived threats to Whiteness” 850 times between October 2025 and April 2026, for an average of four racist tweets per day. He has turned a major social media network into a sewer, and appears to spend hours every day posting this bile from his own phone. That’s approaching what Victorian physicians would have called a monomania, or an idée fixe—a singular, unhealthy obsession that consumes one’s life. But it’s not quite fair to say Musk is single-mindedly obsessed with racial panic. He's also obsessed with the end of the world, and seems to believe that he’s destined to play a messianic role in preserving humanity from otherwise certain doom. Musk told St. Clair that he was trying to produce his legion of children in anticipation of a coming cataclysm. “To reach legion-level before the apocalypse, we will need to use surrogates.” (Will the children die in the apocalypse? Will they be hidden in a bunker? It is not clear what Musk intends.) A key part of the sales pitch for SpaceX is that it will allow H. Sapiens to become a “multiplanetary species,” giving us a backup world (probably Mars, but possibly the Moon too) in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable. The exact cause of the impending crisis is a little vague. Sometimes Musk says superintelligent AI could “kill us all”; sometimes it’s a nuclear war with Russia; sometimes it’s “low birth rates,” which he claims will “end civilization.” The details don’t seem to matter as much as the apocalyptic frame of mind itself. Not that Musk seems to find humanity itself particularly worth saving. He is not Zohran Mamdani, who seems most at home in huge crowds and among street food vendors and taxi drivers. In fact, Musk seems to abhor being around everyday people. Part of his gripe against public transit is that it involves being around “a bunch of random strangers, one of who might be a serial killer.” He wondered why someone would “want to get on something with a lot of other people,” which is part of why he posits ridiculous unworkable schemes to crisscross cities with auto tunnels—the concept of a train or bus is abhorrently collectivist. The feeling of disdain is mutual: polling shows Musk is the least-liked public figure in America among the general public.     The Money is Kind of Fake Anyway   There’s an old Dr. Seuss cartoon from World War II—not, thankfully, one of the racist ones about the Japanese—that depicts Adolf Hitler with a megaphone strapped to his head. He’s chanting increasingly implausible numbers of “Russians Killed” to Goebbels, who’s banging away frantically at a typewriter: “Million! Billion! Trillion! Rillion!” It’s a fitting analogy for what’s going on with Elon Musk, and not only because he keeps lending his support to German far-right parties. After a certain point, the superlative numbers cease to mean much of anything, and the whole concept of “more money” becomes kind of fake. There’s no meaningful difference, in terms of your quality of life, between having “500 billion dollars” and having “a trillion dollars”; there’s no product or property you could buy at the second point that you couldn’t at the first. For all practical purposes, $500 billion was already “unlimited money.” In that way, becoming a trillionaire doesn’t actually give you anything, other than a score-keeping exercise against other rich guys, like Jeff Bezos or Bertrand Arnault. It’s a hollow victory; a plastic trophy that says “I won capitalism” on the side would do just as well. Not that Musk actually has “a trillion dollars” in any commonly understood sense, or ever could. We’re not talking about a Scrooge McDuck style money pile in a vault somewhere, or even a bank account with a balance that reads “$1,000,000,000,000.” The “wealth” being tallied consists mostly of shares in SpaceX and Tesla, Musk’s two biggest and most famous companies, together with miscellaneous other ownership stakes in Twitter/X, the obnoxiously-named “Boring Company,” the sketchy Neuralink brain chips, and so on. Maybe he has a few leftover pocket emeralds, but mostly it’s just the hypothetical value of stocks, which is based in turn on the hypothetical future profits of the companies. In a word, it’s all gambling. Really, Musk couldn’t access “a trillion dollars” if he tried. He’s trapped in a paradox: if he attempts to sell all those shares, or even if there’s a believable rumor that he will, it would be a blaring red disaster signal for the future of the companies, leading their value to plummet almost instantly. It’s a funny kind of “wealth” that only stays “wealth” as long as you don’t touch it. And because the $1 trillion number is so comically large, it’s unclear if enough dollars even exist for the transaction to be possible. According to the Federal Reserve, there is currently about $2.4 trillion of physical currency in circulation, so if Musk wanted to collect his riches in cash, he’d take home roughly half of all the existing bills and coins. Add in all the “reserve balances” that commercial banks deposit with the Federal Reserve itself, and you get a “monetary base” of about $5.4 trillion for the United States. Expand that to the “M2 monetary base,” which includes things like savings deposits and money market funds, and you’re looking at roughly $22.8 trillion. Whichever figure you choose, $1 trillion is a comically large fraction of the overall existing money for one guy to “own,” and if he tried to actually lay hands on it, it would probably cause serious structural problems for the entire monetary system. If we want to be all Marxist about this, we can invoke the term Marx himself used for such things: “fictitious capital.” As old Karl described it, this pseudo-wealth “exists only in the form of claims to capital,” or claims on hypothetical future income. It can be traded and exchanged endlessly, racking up enormous values on paper, but can’t actually be “realized in the form of commodities” at any one time. For the overall global economy, fictitious capital is a problem, because if the gap between the on-paper value of the wealth that’s supposedly circulating and what’s actually being produced gets too big, it won’t be sustainable. That’s a very simplified version of what happened in 2008, when too large a portion of the economy was based on dodgy “subprime loans” and “derivatives” that could never actually be repaid or collected. But for an individual like Musk, to be a paper trillionaire with a fortune of mostly fictitious capital must be a bizarre experience. Essentially, Musk’s entire financial status is based on a series of illusions and propaganda narratives. If he wants to keep it, he has to maintain the expectation that he’ll some day deliver actual, material goods and services equal to the gargantuan valuations of his companies. He has to promise to put a human being on Mars in ten years (that was 14 years ago), or build humanoid robots that can do all your household tasks (one model was just a guy in a Spandex suit), or create a version of the Cybertruck that doesn’t suck (a definitional impossibility). The claims keep getting more grandiose as the stock values climb, and the stress of keeping the whole house of cards upright just doesn’t seem worth it. You’d Feel Sorry for Him, if Not For the Body Count   From a certain angle, Musk can seem like a pitiable figure. He has been given the whole world, but has not managed to achieve the things that really make for a fulfilling life. Despite possessing more wealth than the greatest emperors and potentates, he will still “brood for years about slights” on social media. By all accounts, he did also have a difficult childhood, albeit one cushioned by the privileges enjoyed by white people in Apartheid-era South Africa. He was raised by an awful father, Errol Musk, who has been accused of monstrous acts of sexual abuse against children, resents Elon in particular, and according to Musk’s sister, would spend hours “calling you worthless, pathetic, making scarring and evil comments, not allowing you to leave.” (Elon said of his father: “Almost every crime you can possibly think of, he has done. Almost every evil thing you could possibly think of, he has done. It's so terrible, you can't believe it.”) But even if “hurt people hurt people,” it doesn’t make Musk’s behavior any less horrifying. Musk isn’t particularly philanthropic, of course. His Musk Foundation sometimes doesn’t even give away the minimum amount of money required by law, and in 2023 its largest gift went to another nonprofit called The Foundation run by his associates, which itself runs a private elementary school for children of his employees. The Times reports Musk’s giving “has been haphazard and largely self-serving — making him eligible for enormous tax breaks and helping his businesses.” He did resist Peter Thiel’s pressure to withdraw from Warren Buffett’s Giving Pledge, but the reasoning Thiel reports he gave was not particularly altruistic: “What am I supposed to do – give it to my children? I certainly can’t give it to my trans daughter; that would be bad.” But Musk isn’t just stingy with his own fortune. When he took a role in the federal government he deliberately used his position to take food and medicine from the world’s poorest people, gleefully destroying the agency that provided U.S. medical aid to needy countries, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Musk is a supporter of brutal imperialism (“we will coup whoever we want”), and even flirts with outright neo-Nazism. He is a booster of some of the most hateful and dangerous politicians around the world, and even said that the serial sexual abuser Andrew Tate would make a good U.K. prime minister. Musk bears a significant responsibility for the second Trump presidency. He vowed that even though “I can’t be President… I can help Trump defeat Biden and I will.” And he did, by spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the election. Every horror we are now experiencing, from killings by ICE agents and the building of huge immigrant concentration camps to the brazen attempts to loot the public treasury, are squarely the responsibility of Elon Musk. So there are about 8 billion people on Earth we should feel sorry for before we feel even an ounce of sympathy for Musk, as pathetic a figure as he may be. And yet his entire existence is a cautionary tale, a living moral fable. Yes, our primary focus should be on how capitalism affects the lives of the global poor and the working class, because they are the vast majority of humanity. But Musk shows us that capitalism isn’t good for the rich, either. Like a black hole or a neutron star, the gravitational pull of all that money warps their lives into shapes they would never otherwise have taken. It turns them grotesque, sucks away their joy and humanity, and kills their ability to relate normally to others. Removing Musk’s outlandish wealth and power is not just necessary for the preservation of democracy. It’s a favor to him, and offers the only hope for his redemption.  

  • Eel Smuggling Is The Organized Crime Racket You’ve Never Heard Of

    Despite being the world's most trafficked animal, the European eel receives surprisingly little sympathy. It lacks the mammalian charisma of the creatures whose plights dominate conservation campaigns; among them the shy, helpless pangolin and the stoically intelligent elephant. By contrast, the eel is viewed by many as a source of revulsion: a slimy, writhing reason to stay out of the water. Yet behind inscrutable eyes, it harbors many secrets. This is the story of how an elusive and often misunderstood fish found itself at the center of an international smuggling network.

  • Kill Your Doomerism with Citizen Science

    On one of the first proper spring days in New York City, I found myself wandering through Broad Channel, a quiet, strikingly conservative neighborhood in Queens, to watch Park Rangers drill bits of plastic into the sides of mating Horseshoe Crabs.

  • You Can’t Have Both Democracy and Billionaires

    “What exactly is wrong with the wealthy?” law professor John O. McGinnis asks in Why Democracy Needs The Rich. McGinnis thinks the 1 percent have been unfairly maligned by leftists like Bernie Sanders, and are in need of a vigorous defense. The rich, he says, are productive and useful members of society. If we redistribute their wealth, we only impoverish ourselves. Even those of us who will never be rich ourselves benefit from the presence of oligarchs.

  • “I Want No States”: Norman Finkelstein on the Future of Gaza

    In the second half of his interview with Current Affairs, Dr. Norman Finkelstein discusses the changing political landscape surrounding Palestine, the growing critiques of Israel among right-wing commentators, and why he remains unconvinced by both the one-state and two-state solutions. The political scientist also explains why his latest book, Gaza's Gravediggers: An Inquiry Into Corruption in High Places, focuses less on Israeli propaganda and more than on the failures of prominent human rights organizations to stop a genocide. Because these intuitions are meant to possess a certain "moral authority," Finkelstein says, "it's those betrayals that anger me 10,000 times more."

  • How Hawaiʻi Became the Most Unionized State

    When people think of union towns, they usually think of steel mills, auto assembly plants, and manufacturing warehouses. Usually, their minds do not wander to wide-stretching beaches, active volcanos, or spirited luaus. But that’s what Hawaiʻi is: a union town, or union state to be more precise. Actually, it’s the most unionized state in the nation. A whopping 24.8 percent of Hawaiʻi’s workforce in 2025 were union members, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Compare that to New York, long thought of as a union stronghold, which takes second place at 21.3 percent.

  • "I Won't Be Inclusive of Child Killers": Norman Finkelstein on Israel's "Genocidal Society"

    Dr. Norman Finkelstein is a political scientist, author, and one of the world's foremost scholars on Israel and Palestine. Born in New York City to Jewish Holocaust-survivor parents, Finkelstein says that it would "betray the memory of [his] parents' suffering" to abide Israel's crimes—a decades-long position that has led to academic blacklisting, censorship, and international travel bans.   

  • What the Hell is Going On in Delaware?

    Nationally speaking, the humble state of Delaware doesn’t get much attention. As the second-smallest state in America, it measures roughly 96 miles long and at its widest point, only a svelte 35 miles across. Should you be so inclined, it would take you about an hour and a half to drive all the way from the bottom to the top—presumably, to get somewhere more exciting. The most famous commodity to emerge from Delaware is Joe Biden, along with, apparently, something called “scrapple”: a regional mid-Atlantic breakfast food enticingly described as a “congealed loaf of pork scraps and cornmeal.” What the state lacks in cultural impact, however, it makes up for in far more insidious arenas.

  • The U.S. Is Terrorizing Cuba to Make Rich Men Richer

    Cuba’s blackouts are getting worse. Many are going days without any light at all and the public electric company is “fighting to provide even a few hours of power a day.” The gas stations are empty. There are “mosquitos everywhere.” People in high-rise apartments are cooking with charcoal, risking carbon monoxide poisoning and deadly fires.

  • “Obsession” and the Horror of Treating People Like Products

    What would you do if you could get anything that you ever wanted? Not through some act of blood-soaked violence, but simply through the force of your desire. What if you could manifest it, just make a wish for that thing you really wanted more than anything else? What if all you needed to do was tap a button on a screen and any product you could think of would be with you in just a day? What would you rationalize and excuse away? You could do everything and anything you wanted, able to outsource your sense of responsibility or justice to an abstract and impersonal force, able to be a monumental coward and still indulge your own desire.

  • Astrology Isn’t Just Untrue, It’s Unjust

    I was 26, living in Boston, and working as a cheesemonger when astrology and I first fell out. My friend Allie (not her real name) had just received an email from her boyfriend’s ex containing a triangulation of all their natal charts—and while this hovered near the ceiling of the room I called “normal,” it was 2013, Girls was on the air, and we allowed it.

  • Ben Cohen on War, NATO, Corporate Overlords, and Ice Cream

    Ben Cohen is the co-founder, along with Jerry Greenfield, of the Ben and Jerry's ice cream company. But he has also been involved throughout his life with a number of major activist efforts on issues of peace, social justice, anti-racism, and climate change. He is currently leading the Up In Arms campaign to rein in military spending. Other initiatives he has played a major part in establishing include the People’s Power Initiatives, the Eisenhower Media Network, the Pierre Sprey Award for Investigative Journalism, and the Stamp Stampede campaign for campaign finance reform. Cohen was a national co-chair of Bernie Sanders’ 2020 presidential campaign. He has been arrested multiple times in the course of his activism, including disrupting an RFK Jr. Senate hearing to protest the war in Gaza. He is the author of the book Above The Law: How Qualified Immunity Protects Violent Police (OR Books, featuring an introduction by Killer Mike) and he is currently running a campaign to “free Ben and Jerry’s” from its corporate overlords to protect its social activism. NATHAN J. ROBINSON You are an ice cream man by trade, but one of the very common threads that runs through the "extracurricular work" you have done outside the ice cream business has been issues of war and peace. And recently, people might have seen the conflict with Ben & Jerry'sover creating a flavor for Palestine. You have been arrested. People might have seen you in front of the White House chainsawing a mockup of the Pentagon filled with dollar bills. So let me start by asking you, why have issues of war and peace been so central to the work you've done?

  • We Still Haven’t Processed the Pandemic

    Ever since the COVID pandemic hit in 2020, I’ve been eager to read novels that explore what COVID was, and continues to be like. At the time, writers joked incessantly about how Shakespeare wrote King Lear during an episode of plague in Renaissance England. How would we all use our time? Would we be writing masterpieces? Would the COVID pandemic generate a new, thrilling era of artistic production? Would everyone be writing a pandemic novel?

  • How the U.S. Crushed Democracy in Pakistan

    Waqas Ahmed is an investigative journalist at Drop Site News and the Intercept, specializing in Pakistani politics. Recently, he co-wrote a long piece with Murtaza Hussain and Ryan Grim exposing years of U.S. interference in Pakistan’s democratic process, leading up to the 2022 ouster of Prime Minister Imran Khan. Ahmed sat down with Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to discuss his reporting, and how the U.S. has demolished democracy and human rights in Pakistan.

  • “America First” is Suicidal in the Age of Global Disease Outbreaks

    In early 2025, in a move that was “likely unconstitutional,” the Trump administration, via Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), dismantled the U.S. Agency for International Development. As a result, over 80 percent of USAID programs—around $60 billion overall—were eliminated. According to the United Nations, the United States was the single largest aid donor in the world and supplied more than 40 percent of the global aid that the agency tracked in 2024. Almost overnight, the bulk of it went away—and now, as news of worsening Ebola outbreaks continues to come out of central Africa, we are beginning to see the consequences.

  • Why This Publication Cares About Animals

    Readers may notice that there is an unusually heavy amount of animal-related art and writing in this magazine compared to many others. From our famous “Smoking Cat” cover to our extensive coverage of factory farming, this is a publication overflowing with animals. I’d like to briefly explain why.

  • Why Do We Love Birds, But Slaughter Chickens?

    The first time I met him, the stranger didn’t have a name—he was “the zebra-stripey one.” A notch above “anonymous brown blob,” the species all unmet birds fall into. All I knew was that he was elusive. I chased him and ten of his closest friends down a San Diego hiking trail for 30 minutes trying for an ID. It was on the 61st branch that I managed a clear enough picture, shaken through my binoculars.

  • Chris Smalls Is Still Fighting the Bosses

    Chris smalls is one of the most impactful, and occasionally controversial, activists working today. Since he stepped down as president of the Amazon Labor Union in 2023, Smalls has joined the Freedom Flotilla to Gaza, been imprisoned and beaten by the Israeli military, and got back on the next aid flotilla to challenge Israel’s blockade all over again. He also joined the Nuestra América humanitarian mission to Cuba this March, and got arrested for protesting Jeff Bezos at the Met Gala in May. In Havana, Smalls sat down with Current Affairs associate editor Alex Skopic to discuss his international activism, how people everywhere can unionize their jobs, and his new memoir When the Revolution Comes: A Fight for the Future of the Working Class, out now from Pantheon Books. 

  • Meet the Communist Mayor Offering 50 Cents for Trump's Capture

    There’s a town in Spain called Oleiros whose Communist mayor has been in power since the Cold War. When rolling down its main drag, Avenida Ernesto Che Guevara, you’ll not only be greeted by an eight-meter silhouette of the street’s namesake, but be given the option to hang a left toward an eclectic pantheon of thoroughfares in honor of Galileo, Darwin, Abraham Lincoln, Simón Bolívar, assassinated Nicaraguan revolutionary Augusto Sandino, Guatemala’s CIA-ousted President Jacobo Árbenz, and historic Spanish Prime Minister Adolfo Suárez, to list just a few.

  • How a 1920s Journalist Came to Oppose Zionism

    The other day, I was prowling through Dauphine Street Books—a charming French Quarter bookshop, which is not on Dauphine Street—when I came across a faded volume called Personal History by a man named Vincent Sheean. His name was familiar, but I couldn’t place it. Then I remembered that Noam Chomsky and I had briefly quoted him in The Myth of American Idealism, because he was a journalist who had visited Palestine in the 1920s. But the quote had come from secondary sources, so I’d never seen his memoir itself. I snapped it up, wondering if there might be more interesting material on Palestine in the years before Israel’s establishment. I was not disappointed.

  • How Elon Musk Killed Hundreds of Thousands of People

    For more than 12 years, Nicholas Enrich worked at USAID, the United States Agency for International Development, rising to become one of the agency's top global health officials. Then, in a matter of weeks, he watched as the Trump administration and Elon Musk's "Department of Government Efficiency" (DOGE) dismantled the six-decade-old agency responsible for delivering American foreign aid around the world.  Enrich documented the experience in his book Into the Wood Chipper: A Whistleblower's Account of How the Trump Administration Shredded USAID. He joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to discuss what happened behind the scenes, and its devastating consequences.  

  • We’re at War with Iran Because We Never Punished Bush for Iraq

    It’s been three months since the United States and Israel launched their joint attack on Iran on February 28, assassinating Iran’s head of state and slaughtering schoolchildren in Minab. Ever since, the war against Iran has been an unfolding catastrophe. Day after day, we’ve seen U.S. soldiers coming home in coffins, an estimated 2,100 civilian deaths (and rising) across the region, a supposed “ceasefire” in April where the U.S. has continued striking southern Iran anyway, and an intractable blockade of the Strait of Hormuz that has spiked global energy prices, worsening the cost-of-living crisis for ordinary people everywhere. In the press, the emerging consensus is that Trump’s war is a failure on strategic terms. Less attention has been paid to the more basic fact: that the war is simply wrong, regardless of how successful or unsuccessful it might be.

  • The Right Are No Friends of Palestine

    Since Israel began its genocide on Gaza in 2023, U.S. public opinion has undergone an unprecedented shift. For many decades, both Democrats and Republicans were broadly favorable toward Israel. Now, Pew reports that “eight-in-ten Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents currently have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 69% last year and 53% in 2022.” Even Republicans, who have historically been far more supportive of Israel, have shifted significantly.

  • The NBA’s Newest, Cheapest Owner Shows How Billionaires Ruin Sports

    Just weeks after Texas-based, shady car loan magnate Tom Dundon bought the Portland Trail Blazers, stories of his outrageous cost-cutting decisions quickly broke containment from the Pacific Northwest. Every national sports media outlet covered Dundon’s baffling measures to save himself a few bucks, which included making the team and staff wait hours in a hotel lobby to avoid late checkout fees, leaving part-time players behind in Portland while the team traveled to its playoff series in Texas, and angling to pay a potential new coach about 75 percent less than the going salary for other coaches around the NBA. (That potential coaching search would also ignore the opinions of the actual Blazers players, who have advocated for the team to hire interim head coach Tiago Splitter full-time.) Dundon has alienated himself from the team, city, and fans in record time.

  • When Bernie Ran Burlington

    Today, Bernie Sanders is one of the most important figures in American politics. As biographer Dan Chiasson puts it, Sanders is “arguably the most influential leftist politician in the modern history of the nation,” and he’s consistently ranked as one the most popular American leaders of anykind, alongside Barack Obama. He may not have prevailed in his 2016 or 2020 presidential candidacies (and it’s unlikely there will be another, given Sanders’ advanced age), but he left a permanent mark on the generation that campaigned for him. As Chiasson writes, “Bernie’s influence will be long and profound, as his enthusiastic voters age into power and influence.” Indeed, one of his democratic socialist devotees, Zohran Mamdani, has just been sworn in (by Sanders himself!) as mayor of New York City. But Sanders’ national prominence is a relatively recent development, and even committed leftists may not know the full story of what came before. Chiasson’s new book, Bernie for Burlington: The Rise of the People’s Politician, is about Sanders’ first act, when in 1981 he improbably became the country’s only socialist mayor, just as the “Reagan Revolution” was sweeping the country. Today, Mamdani, Seattle’s Mayor Katie Wilson, and others are aiming to replicate something like what Sanders tried in tiny Burlington, Vermont. This makes Sanders’ origin story worthy of study, especially for those of us who want to know how the left can succeed.

  • Four Days in Havana, Under Siege

    Being internationalists is paying our debt to humanity. Whoever is incapable of fighting for others will never be capable of fighting for himself.

  • Chris Rabb: “Who Can Better Understand the Plight of Palestinians Than African Americans?”

    On Tuesday, Chris Rabb became the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania’s 3rd congressional district—a House seat where there is currently no Republican candidate, making his election to Congress in November overwhelmingly likely. Rabb sat down for an interview on the Katie Halper Show, where he discussed his family’s abolitionist legacy, the necessity of taking firm stands on Palestine and abolishing ICE, and why “Fetterman” is the real F-word in Pennsylvania politics. 

  • The Absurd Sexism of Euphoria’s Third Season

    When HBO’s Euphoria premiered in 2019, critics were equal parts entranced and horrified. Some praised creator Sam Levinson for his fresh take on the high-school drama genre, including its gritty portrayal of drug addiction; others questioned whether it was really necessary to hire 20-something actresses to play 16-year-olds, then repeatedly show their bare breasts onscreen (not an illegal creativechoice, per se, but certainly a questionable one).

  • The Indictment of Raúl Castro is a New Low in U.S. Cuba Policy

    So apparently the Trump administration has decided that what Cuba really needs right now—after decades of economic strangulation, CIA assassination attempts, sabotage campaigns, invasions, sanctions, blackouts, shortages, and more than half a century of failed regime-change policy—is the indictment of 94-year-old revolutionary icon Raúl Castro.

  • It’s My Civic Duty to Break Into Labs and Rescue Dogs

    On April 18, 2026, I was arrested on felony charges and jailed for three days in Dane County, Wisconsin. I was the leader of 1,000+ people who had just engaged in a brutal confrontation with police. At my bail hearing, a court commissioner ruled I was so dangerous that he had to take the unprecedented step of banning me from the county entirely.

  • Dr. Margaret Connolly: “Irish People Are Behind the Palestinian Cause”

    Dr. Margaret Connolly is a humanitarian activist with the newest version of the Global Sumud Flotilla, which has been sailing to Gaza in an attempt to deliver food and medical aid to besieged Palestinian civilians since April 10. Over the past two days, the Israeli military intercepted the entire flotilla, boarding its vessels approximately 250 nautical miles from the coast of Gaza in a blatant act of piracy. Dr. Connolly, along with many other volunteers from around the world, is now a political prisoner in Israeli custody. Coincidentally, she is also the sister of Ireland’s President Catherine Connolly, who says she is “very proud” of her sibling.

  • Why Democrats Need to Fight the Crypto Industry

    Let’s be brutally honest. At this point, nearly two decades in, there are still no—I repeat, no—significant legal use cases for cryptocurrency. Bitcoin, the supposed genesis of this revolution, was conjured in 2008. In tech years, that’s practically prehistoric—barely younger than the iPhone, positively ancient compared to Apple Pay. For 17 agonizing years, crypto advocates have shrieked from the rooftops that blockchain tokens will imminently displace conventional finance with widespread legal use cases. “Any day now,” they crow. Yet “any day” stubbornly refuses to arrive.

  • The Radical Non-Binary Preacher Left Out of the History of America’s Founding

    Jemima Wilkinson was born in Rhode Island, that colonial hotbed of difficult women, in 1752. In 1776, a year best remembered for other crises, Wilkinson took to her bed with a high fever, in a medical crisis so intense that her family nearly despaired of the vigorous young woman’s life. And in a way, they did lose Jemima. The figure that rose from the sweaty bedsheets when the fever broke was, by their own account, a reborn entity using the physical form of the recovering girl. Announcing a new, genderless identity as the Public Universal Friend, they began a career as a preacher, building on the Quakerism of their youth to evangelize a new denomination, the Society of Universal Friends, to the people of the fledgling United States. That ministry would last until the Friend’s death in 1819.

  • A Brief Tribute to New Orleans Music

    “There is a real mania in this city for horn and trumpet playing,” remarked the New Orleans Daily Picayune in 1838. “You can hardly turn a corner,” it lamented, without hearing brass players, quoting a local who said he “earnestly desired to hear the last trumpet.” We are coming upon 200 years later, and the situation hasn’t changed much. On my bike rides home through the French Quarter, I often get caught behind a second-line parade, usually for a wedding, the band belting out “L’il Liza Jane” or “Hey Baby.” Then there are the regular Sunday parades put on by the Social Aid and Pleasure clubs, with names like the Men & Lady Buckjumpers, the Uptown Swingers, the Dumaine Street Gang, the Pigeon Town Steppers, the Valley of Silent Men, and the Black Men of Labor. They snake through neighborhoods, with the brass bands blaring for hours at a stretch and the whole community coming out to dance.

  • The Album the British Government Doesn’t Want You to Hear

    A new album from Kneecap, at this point, is like a brick thrown through the window of the international music charts. Ever since they put up a “FUCK ISRAEL, FREE PALESTINE” banner at last year’s Coachella music festival, the politically-charged Irish rap group has been at the center of an ever-escalating hailstorm of controversy. Frontman Mo Chara (government name Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh) faced terrorism charges for an incident where he allegedly waved a Hezbollah flag a fan threw at him onstage, then beat the case in court. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, in between rounds of cutting people’s disability benefits, called Kneecap’s politics “completely intolerable.” The governments of Canada and Hungary have both banned the group from entering their countries, and they’ve lost their U.S. visa sponsor, making it impossible for them to tour in the States for the time being. Sharon Osbourne called for them to be banned from the stage at Glastonbury, and even the once-great punk rocker Johnny Rotten of the Sex Pistols has deemed them “my enemy.” This March, Kneecap came under attack yet again from U.S. Representative Maria Salazar, this time for visiting and performing in Cuba, a trip we covered in this magazine. Their music has become a focal point for the broader, world-spanning fight over colonialism and resistance, and exactly what forms of political expression are and aren’t acceptable.

  • The Only Candidate Chuck Schumer Fears

    Dr. Abdul el-sayed is, according to a new poll released on Monday, the front-runner in the Democratic Senate primary in Michigan. He joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to discuss the state of the race, how politics in America seem to be shifting to the Left, why he supports Chris Van Hollen to lead the Senate, and how to stop wars and deliver universal healthcare. 

  • Why They Don’t Want You Driving a Chinese Car

    I took my first ride in a Chinese car recently. Not in the U.S., of course, since sky-high tariffs have made them almost impossible to import. I was visiting family in the U.K., and we rented a BYD Sealion SUV. And let me tell you: I saw immediately why American car companies are desperate to have these things kept out of this country. It was elegantly designed, incredibly comfortable, and a smooth ride.

  • Hampshire College Rejected the Market Model of Education

    On Tuesday, April 14, it was announced that Hampshire College, my alma mater, a pathbreaking experiment in radical pedagogy, would be permanently closing in the fall of this year. With its first class of 250 students in 1970, Hampshire’s founders took the bold approach of believing that young people could design their own educations. The college never had tests or grades, and students created their own majors. This self-directed curriculum has been imitated elsewhere but retained its purest form at Hampshire. So long as you could find a mentor, you could cobble together a concentration in almost anything: game design, ancient Irish, cheesemaking—the world was your oyster. That was the idea, anyway. As you can imagine, at an underfunded school full of overworked faculty and weird teenagers, things often went pear-shaped. But failure and the self-discovery that went with it were all supposed to be part of the Hampshire experience.

  • Saving New Orleans Is Not Optional

    People in New Orleans sometimes say casually that the city “will be underwater” eventually, and we should enjoy it while we can. But a new paper in Nature Sustainability, covered by the Guardian, argues that this is no hyperbole. Yes, the authors say, New Orleans will be underwater, and sooner rather than later. The city is doomed, they say, and we should all leave. The situation, they claim, is hopeless. Rising sea levels will inundate south Louisiana within one generation, and the question we should now be asking is how to relocate the entire population in an orderly manner.

  • Why “Progress” Is a Dangerous Idea

    Samuel miller McDonald is a long-time contributor to Current Affairs, where he’s written about everything from the limits of “clean” energy to the cultural legacy of Seinfeld. He is also the author of the new book Progress: How One Idea Built Civilization and Now Threatens to Destroy It, available now from Macmillan. He joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to explain why he believes “progress” is such a misleading, and even dangerous, idea.

  • What I Learned From Reading Apartheid Propaganda

    In 1989, as South Africa lost its last allies behind a wall of international sanctions, the German-born writer Klaus D. Vaqué wrote an impassioned defense of his adopted home country. His book, The Plot Against South Africa, provides a unique viewpoint: one through the eyes of the country’s white minority rulers.

  • The Democratic Establishment Can Be Defeated

    A lot of leftists I know became very disillusioned by Bernie Sanders’ two losses in the 2016 and 2020 Democratic primaries. They felt like Sanders’ failure showed you can’t beat the establishment, that the system is rigged, and that the Democratic Party is simply captured by corporate-friendly centrists who will crush any effort to take the party in a different direction. I’ve spoken with people who think there’s no choice but to run third-party campaigns, and have essentially given up on the Democrats.

  • The Insidious World of Lolcows

    He started out by eating a roll of toilet paper in 2011. Then came the videos swallowing raw eggs, jars of wasabi, burgers still in the wrapping, Vegemite by the spoonful, and soon enough, sticks of deodorant by the mouthful, lit matches, and bottles of glue. By 2014, Chris Schewe (better known by his username “shoenice”) had built a YouTube following of more than 50 million views and over 200,000 subscribers, who continued to tune in as he perfected his star act: downing entire bottles of high-proof liquor in one gulp.

  • Mouin Rabbani Breaks Down the Crisis in the Middle East

    Mouin Rabbani is one of the foremost analysts of the Middle East working today. He’s a senior fellow at the Middle East Council on Global Affairs, an editor at the journal Jadaliyya, and the author of the forthcoming book Gaza Apocalypse: A Genocide Diary. You might also remember him as Norman Finkelstein’s debate partner in their epic four-hour exchange with Israeli historian Benny Morris and Steven “Destiny” Bonnell, or as the prolific social-media critic of what he calls the “Hasbara Symphony Orchestra.” He joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to unravel the chaos coming out of the Trump White House, the joint U.S.-Israeli wars on Iran and Lebanon, 

  • In Defense of 'The Drama'

    SPOILER ALERT: The following review contains spoilers for the film The Drama. If you purchased a ticket to The Drama expecting a light-hearted romantic comedy, you, too, might have found yourself choking on your popcorn about ten minutes in. The promotion surrounding A24’s latest filmwas intentionally tight-lipped, trailers hinting only at some unspecified rift between a couple leading up to their wedding, but no one could have guessed the real premise: an exploration of America’s chronic mass shooting problem, and what forgiveness looks like for people who consider—yet never actually commit—terrible acts of violence.