Publication

Current Affairs

Visit Current Affairs

Recent coverage

  • Abdul El-Sayed Becomes the First Current Affairs Contributor Nominated For U.S. Senate

    Current Affairs is pleased to announce that public health expert Dr. Abdul El-Sayed has been nominated as the Democratic Party candidate for U.S. Senate in Michigan. Our magazine has covered Dr. El-Sayed’s work many times over the years, and he is a former contributor to our pages and our YouTube channel. This victory has significant ramifications for American politics, as a remarkable demonstration of progressives’ political power. El-Sayed prevailed despite tens of millions of dollars being spent by AIPAC in order to stop him. If he wins in November, it will be a powerful rebuke to those who claim that left politics cannot win in “purple” states.

  • The Real Extremism Problem Is on the Right, Not the Left

    It’s a funny experience, opening your local newspaper and finding that it condemns your own politics as a threat to the nation. But that’s what happened this Sunday, when the Times-Picayune of New Orleans ran a column by editor Quin Hillyer, breathlessly informing the Crescent City that “leftist Dems are dangerous.” Everyone should be worried about “the radicals and socialists who are making big inroads in the national Democratic Party,” Hillyer insists, including Dr. Abdul El-Sayed (who is not a socialist), Melat Kiros of Colorado, Darializa Avila Chevalier in New York, and so on. According to the column, these candidates are “outlandishly beyond the pale” because they seek to “tear down a host of cultural institutions and mores that most Americans see as essential parts of a healthy society.” Like many conservatives, Mr. Hillyer believes he knows best about where “the pale” is and what a “healthy society” consists of: his objections to leftist politicians are many, but include that “they want to defund the police, adopt the financially and arithmetically impossible Green New Deal, provide Medicare for All, defund the Department of Defense (!) and eliminate ‘the entire global system of capital,’ among many other radical (or even crazy) ideas.” Allow the Democratic Socialists of America and their allies to gain power, he warns, and the Democratic Party risks becoming a “den of malevolence and lunacy.”

  • Israel’s Rave Music Drowns Out the Sound of its Victims

    It’s 6:29 AM on a Tuesday. A drum machine repeats the base four kicks on a four-beat measure; 1/2/3/4 for up to 150 beats per minute. EDM fans pour through the dance floor with tribal tattoos, piercings, and canopies dye-printed with Ganesha fluttering in the wind. Israeli DJ Yarin Illovich plays, under his stagename Artifex, to a crowd dressed in pashmina scarves, bindi forehead jewelry, and loose-fitting shalwar trousers. Dancers pulse to mushrooms, pills, ecstasy, LSD, DMT, and ayahuasca. Like other psychedelic trance festivals worldwide, it is a well-funded dream of Hindu paganism. Attendees float outside their environment and consciousness, smoking opium and building a Xanadu pleasure-dome near the desert stream of Wadi Nahabir. Suddenly: a massive boom. Sirens. Cracks. Pops. Hisses. And screeches. A universe is broken and remade by the warfare that nurtured it into being.

  • Mel Brooks, Antifascist Filmmaker

    One of the great canards of the culture wars is that you couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today. It’s a half-truth that disguises a bigger lie. There are a thousand and one reasons why it would be hard—though, as Django Unchained proved, not impossible—to get a movie like Blazing Saddles made in contemporary Hollywood, from the declining public knowledge of the Western genre conventions it parodies to the general demise of big, mainstream comedy movies from the major studios. But the idea that you couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today is not about any of that. It is, more than anything, about the prodigious number of N-words the film jams into 93 minutes. “You couldn’t make Blazing Saddles today” is the rallying cry of people who think politically correct cancel culture is a major force in American society even as the U.S. slides deeper and deeper into Christian-nationalist fascism. The irony, of course, is that were Blazing Saddles to be erased from memory Yesterday-style and then unleashed on the world afresh tomorrow, Elon Musk would spend more time crying about it on X The Everything App than he has about Christopher Nolan’s The Odyssey having Black people in it.

  • Trita Parsi Says America is Headed for Yet Another Endless War

    Trita Parsi is one of the leading experts on U.S.–Iran relations and the co-founder of theQuincy Institute For Responsible Statecraft, a think tank formed to move the U.S. away from constant aggression and toward the pursuit of international peace. The Iranian-born analyst joinedCurrent Affairs for the second time this year to discuss the dismal state of peace negotiations with Iran—and why, he says, American wars so often turn endless: "Because the political courage to end them does not exist, and it takes less political courage to just continue them and lie to the American people that victory is around the corner."

  • My Day in the Gig Economy

    This story was co-published and supported by the journalism non-profit the Economic Hardship Reporting Project .  

  • Send Ben Shapiro to Iran

    If you’re in the U.S. military, Ben Shapiro would like you to know that he considers your life acceptable collateral damage. “No one in America wants American casualties, it’s a tragedy and a horror,” the Daily Wire pundit said ina recent video on the war with Iran. But, he continued, “We do understand that war does come along with casualties. And we are willing to undergo those casualties in pursuit of an end, and a victory for America.” In other words, Shapiro believes defeating Iran is so important that, if you or your loved ones in the armed forces happen to get blown up in the process, that’s all very sad, but ultimately worth it. Which raises an interesting question: since he feels that way, when will Ben grab a rifle, strap a Kevlar helmet on his head, and put the rest of his body where his mouth is?

  • Meta’s Training Camp for Building Data Centers is an Anti-Union Scheme

    "Learn coding, teach ai, get replaced by AI, go learn electrical work to build ai's building, get laid off after building complete." That’s how one Redditor summed up a hypothetical career trajectory in the AI era, capturing the economic whiplash in one sentence. Last month, Facebook parent company Meta put $115 million behind that third step. The company announced its launch of America's Workforce Academy, a free five-week training program promising “American heroes”—which encompasses basically anyone—a guaranteed construction job offer from the contractors who build Meta’s AI data centers.

  • Centrists Are Not More "Electable"

    There is a popular—and completely wrong—view of politics that candidates who are “extreme” stand no chance, while candidates who are “moderate” are more “electable.” To its proponents, this can seem like a truth so obvious that it is virtually a mathematical deduction. The median voter theorem says that if voters are distributed along an ideological spectrum, the candidate closest to the median voter will prevail. Therefore, centrism is not just a set of beliefs about ideal public policy, it is a science of winning elections.

  • We Can’t Let the Right Have Mold, Too

    The first morning I woke up in my new apartment, something felt off. As soon as I opened my eyes, they began to sting. Moments later, I realized my throat was burning, too, and what was that in my gut? The lining of my stomach felt like someone had taken sandpaper to it. The raw feeling wasn’t horribly intense, but so clear that I thought I was, for the first time, sensing the exact shape of my organ. Sure, I had had allergies before, but never like this—what the hell was going on? I took stock of my condition, deteriorated suddenly overnight, and before I could lift my groggy head from the pillow, a thought boomed in my mind: I have mold.

  • Neoliberal Economics Was a Con From The Start

    Americans across the country feel that our economy is broken, as stagnant wages and rising prices make it increasingly impossible to get by. In reality, the system is working exactly as designed. 

  • Diarrhea in Every Pot and a Gun in Every Mailbox

    Suddenly, the wordenshittification has become literal. Before this month, Americans already had more than enough problems to worry about, fromfood and fuel costs to a heinous and seemingly never-endingwar with Iran. But now, we’ve got a Biblical plague ofdiarrhea to contend with too. It’s not the first of its kind, but it’s hitting the national bowels especially hard, aided by the dismantling of regulations and public health networks across the country in the 2020s. Meanwhile, our politicians are too busy with their own reckless profit-making schemes to field much of a response. So as the shit-storm spreads across the map, it’s revealing some critical fault lines in the American state itself.

  • In Praise of Suit Socialism

    Leftist Twitch streamer Hasan Piker says “I’m a suit guy now.” The reason is simple, he explains: “Moms and dads are watching.” Piker has said that when he wears suits, people’s grandmas think he’s serious, respectable, and handsome. And because he’s trying to maximize the reach of his political message, well, that means putting on a tie. He has joked that “wearing a suit is lingerie for old conservative ladies,” and if he’s in quality menswear “they’re a lot more receptive to what I have to say. This is how we spark the revolution.”

  • What I Learned Debating Fascists on a Phone Sex Hotline

    Call me jaded, but I thought Bryon Noem's comically large breasts were kind of underwhelming. When photos of the embattled former Secretary of State Kristi Noem’s husband leaked in March, the 56-year-old father of three could be seen in a skintight flesh-colored shirt stuffed with a pair of latex balloons each as big as his head. Security analysts warned that his spending $25,000 on online “bimbofication” fetish models left his high-ranking family vulnerable to extortion while the internet laughed. And sure, the cockeyed nipples were funny—hilarious, even. It's just that, after getting a glimpse of the modern man's psyche over several years a sex worker, I was too haunted by the familiarity of that buxom insurance executive’s joyless expression to take much pleasure in his public humiliation.

  • Judith Butler Explains the Gender Panic

    Judith Butleris one of the world’s leading scholars and philosophers on issues of gender, sexuality, and the cultural phenomena that surround them. They are the author of the landmark 1990 book Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity, and more recently the 2024 follow-up work Who’s Afraid of Gender? Butler joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to discuss the way people around the world—mostly conservatives, but some who consider themselves leftists, too—have become fearful and angry about what they call “gender ideology,” why they’re mistaken, and what might be done about it.

  • Property Taxes Are Good, Actually

    Florida governor Ron DeSantis has attacked the very concept of property taxes. In a speech last year, he portrayed them as unfair. “You buy a home, you pay off the mortgage, and yet, you still have to write a check to the government every year—just for the privilege of living on your own private property. Is the property yours, or are you just renting it from the government?” DeSantis is trying to push through a “reform” to Florida’s property tax system that would eventually exempt the first $250,000 of a person’s home value from being taxed, promising that eventually 60 percent of homeowners would pay no property tax at all. Proposals to eliminate or heavily limit property tax are under consideration in other states, too. The Idaho Republican Party has called for the wholesale elimination of property tax, describing it as “an inherently unjust tax that converts privately owned property into government collateral and threatens homeownership.”

  • How Google is Pushing Scam Videos on Elderly and Cognitively Impaired People

    I’ve heard some wild claims in YouTube ads, but “The Pantry Find” still managed to make me do a double take. “If you’re a Christian, and you don’t know that the cure for Alzheimer’s and dementia is in the Bible, you should read the Scriptures again.” A bespectacled man in a white shirt and tie, looking something like a Mormon missionary, is sitting behind a desk with a bottle of honey and a pack of cinnamon sticks. Behind him are respectability-enhancing bookcases, although if you look closely the titles are garbled and AI-generated. The man goes on:

  • Kshama Sawant on Confronting Bad Politicians in Both Parties

    Kshama sawant is an independent socialist who served on the Seattle city council for a decade. She had a key role in winning a $15 minimum wage for the city in 2014, and more recently in the movement to raise it to $21.30, giving Seattle one of the highest wages in the United States. Now, she’s running for the House of Representatives against Adam Smith, a corporate Democrat with a penchant for supporting overseas wars. She joined Current Affairs editor-in-chief Nathan J. Robinson to discuss the state of the race.

  • Simone de Beauvoir Taught Us Everything We Need To Know About Gender

    When I first heard the term “girl math” online a couple of years ago, my first thought, as a mathematics student applying for Ph. D. programs, was “This is great! Maybe people are finally coming around to the idea of women being mathematicians!” Imagine my surprise, then, when I learned that rather than being a phrase to highlight women’s mathematical accomplishments, it was being used by women in order to justify buying a coffee or getting their nails done. “If I pay with cash, but my bank balance stays the same, it’s basically like it’s free! Girl math!” It’s used as a rationalization for the stereotype of women spending too much money on things that, for one reason or another, society thinks they don’t need. Rather than try to eloquently defend themselves, women have decided to make themselves the butt of the joke. Again.

  • The African Farmers Devastated by Extreme Heat

    At the height of the 2024–2025 El Niño-induced drought, I watched in revulsion as hundreds of emaciated cattle desperately crowded for a drink around a small muddy dam in Mutare district in eastern Zimbabwe.

  • Haley Stevens Is an Extremist, Not a Centrist

    No two years are ever the same. 2026 is certainly not 2024. Two years ago, the Democratic primary for the U.S. Senate in Michigan was a bore. Then-Congresswoman (and ex-CIA agent) Elissa Slotkin was widely expected to triumph over little-known challenger Hill Harper, and so she did. The only excitement in the affair came when Harper—and withdrawn candidate Nasser Beydoun—claimed to have been offered $20 million in campaign contributions from a pro-Israel group to drop out of the race and primary Palestinian-American Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib.

  • Why Mourn Lindsey Graham and Not His Victims?

    After Lindsey Graham’s recent sudden death, tributes to the late South Carolina senator did not just come from his fellow Republicans. Democrats, too, were effusive in honoring his career and character. Joe Biden said that while he and Graham may have had their policy differences, they agreed “on the profound importance of public service” and Graham “loved the Senate as an institution, even with all its flaws and complexities.” Minnesota’s Amy Klobuchar said Graham had a “zest for life” and a “love for the world,” that he was a loyal friend who would be dearly missed. Adam Schiff praised Graham’s “sense of humor and how he deployed it to move his policy positions forward.” He said that “though we did not often agree, Senator Graham was never disagreeable.” Mark Warner said he was “heartbroken.” Cory Booker, Elizabeth Warren, Kamala Harris (he was "full of wit, energy, and charm"), Chuck Schumer: all gave variations on the same statement. They disagreed with Graham, but he was an essentially honorable man with whom they were happy to work.

  • “Dogme 95” Changed the Way We Look at Movies

    On March 13, 1995, at a celebration of the centenary of cinema in Paris, Danish filmmakers Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg announced their intention to launch a new film movement. They distributed a manifesto and an accompanying Vow of Chastity, and didn’t take any questions. Most film movements—Italian neorealism, say, or new queer cinema—happen organically and are blurrily defined, getting a name as filmmakers, critics and audiences happen to notice features which seem to link certain films together. Not this one. Dogme 95 (Danish for, as you might have guessed, “dogma 95”) consists of exactly 35 films, each numbered and given a certificate.

  • How An AIPAC Smear Campaign Works

    I was recently in Michigan, reporting for the Nation about the Senate campaign of Abdul El-Sayed. The race has hugely important implications. El-Sayed is a Medicare For All-supporting, Bernie Sanders-style progressive and critic of the Democratic leadership, who wants to cut off U.S. military aid to Israel. His opponent, Haley Stevens, is a centrist so devoted to Israel that she says the country “comes to me in my dreams.” (Note: Stevens is not even Jewish!) If El-Sayed defeats Stevens, it will be another step forward for the left-wing insurgency that is currently roiling the Democratic Party (see the victories by Zohran Mamdani, Darializa Avila Chevalier, Melat Kiros, and a certain odious oysterman who is best forgotten but whose electoral success nevertheless showed the weakness of the party establishment). If El-Sayed wins his primary and defeats Republican Mike Rogers in November, he will have destroyed the argument that milquetoast centrism is necessary for winning swing states, and he will immediately be discussed as a potential presidential contender. On the other hand, if El-Sayed loses in November, it will be seen as proof that “safe” candidates are needed, and the left will be accused of having sabotaged the Democrats’ chances at taking the seat. The name “George McGovern” will frequently be spoken.

  • The United States Is No Longer Pretending it Doesn’t Support Terrorists

    Unless you followed the Syrian Civil War closely, or possibly have a special interest in Byzantine architecture, Qalb Loze is not a town you will have heard of. Tucked away in the northwest corner of Syria, near the border with Turkey, its population is only around 1,200. Most of the residents are followers of the Druze religion, olive and tobacco farmers whose crops fuel the local cigarette industry. They go to work every day in the shadow of an ancient Christian basilica, constructed around the year 470; not being Christians themselves, they haven’t had much use for it, although somebody tried using it as a sheep stable once. When the Syrian Civil War broke out in 2011, Qalb Loze stayed carefully neutral. But that didn’t save them when Ahmed al-Sharaa’s jihadists came to town.

  • How Fear of Nuclear Armageddon Leads Me to Protest

    It was May 20, 2026, at one minute past midnight. I and two colleagues stood in front of the main gate of Vandenberg Space Force Base (VSFB), located along Highway 1 (AKA the Pacific Coast Highway), on the Central Coast of California. We were looking up to the night sky. Suddenly a large, tube-shaped object appeared, launched from the base, traveling southwest over the Pacific Ocean, with flames coming from its rear end. A delayed, rumbling roar arose behind it. We were briefly spellbound by the display, and lowered our protest signs to our sides. We were somewhat awed, somewhat afraid, and somewhat angered by the spectacle.

  • Charles Booker Has a Plan to Replace Mitch McConnell

    Charles booker is the Democratic nominee for Senate in Kentucky, and part of the wave of progressive candidates who have been racking up victories in their primaries recently. A former Kentucky state House Representative, Booker is a supporter of Medicare for All, abolishing ICE, and a “Working People’s Bill of Rights” that includes better wages and union protections. He joined Current Affairs associate editor Alex Skopic to discuss the state of the Kentucky race, and why he believes he has a real shot to replace Senator Mitch McConnell in November. 

  • You Can’t Love America Without Hating Capitalism

    The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) are a “hate group,” and what they hate is “America,” says the National Review. Zohran Mamdani hates America, says Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX). Leftist Twitch streamer Hasan Piker is also accused of hating America. In 2004, after filmmaker Michael Moore released the antiwar documentary Fahrenheit 9/11, an entire response film was called Michael Moore Hates America.

  • Who Will Save the Internet From Disappearing?

    We’ve all heard the warning that “the internet is forever.” In reality, huge swaths of the digital world are disappearing all the time, as websites go dark, governments purge public records, social media posts vanish, and streaming platforms remove films and music. Without deliberate efforts to preserve this material, much of our recent history could simply cease to exist. The Internet Archive has spent decades fighting that disappearance, most notably through its Wayback Machine, which preserves snapshots of a web that is otherwise constantly being rewritten. Current Affairs spoke with Mark Graham, director of the Wayback Machine, and librarian Chris Freeland, co-editor of the Internet Archive’s new Vanishing Culture report, about why the internet is far more fragile than we think and what is lost when corporations and governments can make information disappear.

  • Jessica Burbank on the Rise of Flock Safety and America's Surveillance State

    As Americans are told to accept an ever-expanding web of cameras, drones, and AI-powered policing in the name of public safety, few journalists have followed the rise of Flock Safety as closely as Jessica Burbank. An investigative reporter and political commentator, Burbank published an early in-depth investigation into the rapidly growing surveillance company for Dropsite News. She has since continued reporting on Flock through a series of investigations and a self-produced documentary—free to watch on YouTube—which examines how the company is reshaping policing and civil liberties across the country. Burbank joined Current Affairs to discuss the expansion of mass surveillance in America, how Flock has embedded itself in local governments with remarkably little public scrutiny, and why she believes its growth poses a profound threat to democratic freedoms.

  • How Environmentalists Became America's First Modern "Domestic Terrorists"

    I knew we were screwed the moment I was introduced to the guy from Colorado. The supposed owner of a Denver marijuana store who claimed not to have been political prior to the 2016 election of Donald Trump, he told us he had since become an ardent “Antifa activist” and had driven halfway across the country to Georgia for the privilege of getting tear-gassed at 11 o’clock on a Monday morning. Whether he was conjured from the political fantasies of Fox News or given corporeal form by some Dr. Frankenstein at the DeKalb County Police Department, as he headed off into the parking lot that night, a seasoned organizer whispered, “He has got to be an undercover.” That was indeed the last we saw of the guy from Colorado—unless he was on the other side of the police line two days later, staring us down through the iron sight of a military surplus machine gun.

  • Keir Starmer’s Downfall is a Warning for the Democrats

    Looking at Sir Keir Starmer, you start to understand why the Japanese invented ritual seppuku. Less than two years ago, Starmer led the British Labour Party to a commanding general-election victory, securing 411 seats in Parliament and becoming the first Labour Prime Minister in over a decade. But today, his approval ratings are in the toilet and his government is in disarray, with the Green Party scoring election wins against him on the Left and Nigel Farage’s xenophobic Reform Party rising on the Right. It’s been a humiliating fall from grace, and Starmer finally admitted defeat last week, announcing his resignation. (With his exit, Larry the Cat has outlasted six successive PMs.) But people in the United States should be paying close attention to the rise and fall of Starmerism, too, because if elected Democrats in this country don’t make some changes, they may soon meet the same fate.

  • Taxpayer-Funded Sports Stadiums Are a Massive Scam

    Even in our politically divided times, there are a few things most people can still agree are good and appropriate uses of public funds. Usually, these revolve around physical infrastructure: roads, bridges, public schools, libraries, and so on. Simultaneously, sports remain effective catalysts for bringing communities together and building civic pride in a city and state, as we’ve just seen with the massive outpouring of joy over the New York Knicks’ championship run. Sports are not, however, social services, and despite what the teams and owners keep claiming, the stadiums they play in provide few tangible returns for the average taxpayer.

  • The Hidden Pronatalist Agenda Behind the Right's Attack on Education

    Last year, at a Women’s History Month event, Donald Trump called himself the “fertilization president.” The moniker is an obviously pronatalist one, and it comes alongside a rise of cultural and political concern over the birth rate, particularly on the right. That concern is based on the fact that the United States birth rate has fallen considerably since 2007.

  • Molly Crabapple on the Jewish Left that History Forgot

    A ward-winning i llustrator and journalist Molly Crabapple has spent her career documenting revolutions and political upheavals around the world—or, as she puts it, "extremes from nightclubs to war zones." Her latest book explores a different kind of history: the story of the Jewish Labor Bund, the mass socialist movement that organized millions of Eastern European Jews around labor rights and cultural autonomy, alongside fierce opposition to both Zionism and antisemitism. Here Where We Live Is Our Country  is now a national bestseller, resonating with readers in search of a forgotten tradition of Jewish politics. Current Affairs spoke with Crabapple about why the Bund's history feels newly relevant today, and why excavating this neglected past has become, for many readers, a source of hope.

  • The Left Is Rising

    Don’t take it from me. Take it from Fox News. Socialists are winning everywhere! This week, three Congressional candidates backed by democratic socialist New York City mayor Zohran Mamdani won “stunning” victories in their primary elections. It is even being called the “Mamdani tsunami.” The successes of Claire Valdez, Darializa Avila Chevalier, and Brad Lander confirmed that Mamdani’s own election was not a fluke for the city’s left, in what even the Bezos Postacknowledged was “a signal of strength for Mamdani’s political brand and the democratic socialist movement that powered his rise to City Hall.”

  • We’re All Trapped in Capitalism’s Backrooms

    Modern horror media is always a revelation about the world that produced it, but few of our contemporary myths feel as precisely calibrated to the present moment as the Backrooms. The Backrooms are not a haunted house, nor an abandoned ruin, a cursed forest, or any of the traditional thresholds through which the uncanny once entered human life. Instead, they are a vision of horror stripped of enchantment: an endless, fluorescent purgatory assembled from the leftover materials of capitalism. In the Backrooms, the mystery is not supernatural but infrastructural: a place where the hidden architecture of modern life, from its storage spaces to its industrial offices, swallows the individual whole. It is a nightmare born from the aesthetics of contemporary capitalism’s logistics, a world in which even our terrors have been flattened into endlessly repeatable, industrial modularity.

  • The Most American Show on TV is About Hating Your Neighbors

    “Love thy neighbor” may be a central commandment of the Bible, but you’ll find no such law in the Constitution. For many Americans, bubbling beneath the surface of our collective psyche is a fear that our neighbors—whether next door or several miles away—are constantly poised to harm us. If not for our guns, fences, and extensive armies of Ring doorbell cameras, the very people living on our street may try to take what’s ours. As the subjects of HBO’s latest docu-series Neighbors know well, our nation’s real ethos may be: keep your friends close and your enemies closer.

  • The Silence on Climate Change Is Totally Unacceptable

    Something odd and disturbing has happened on the issue of climate change in the last few years. Even as the crisis has gotten worse, and the need to address it more urgent, elected officials have been talking about it less. This month, Vox’s Kate Yoderobserves that “Democratic politicians who once talked about climate change as the defining crisis of our time now barely mention it at all” and “the phrase has begun disappearing from their speeches, social media posts, and podcast appearances.” (Republican politicians never pretended to care about it in the first place.) That includes some politicians who had previously been major climate advocates. And it’s not just among politicians. A recent Rockefeller Foundation report found “there has been a broad, persistent retreat in public language about climate,” with climate news coverage falling by nearly 40% and companies stopping discussing sustainability. Americans now “say they are hearing less about climate change in the news, on social media, and from people they know.”

  • A Trillion Dollars Isn’t Worth It If You Have to Be Elon Musk

    “What shall it profit a man, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul?” — some homeless Palestinian Elon Musk is, at least on paper, the world’s first trillionaire. He reached that milestone on June 12, after SpaceX debuted as a publicly-traded company on the U.S. stock market at an initial offering of $150 per share. At the time of writing, that price has risen to about $185, taking Musk’s estimated net worth to $1.4 trillion as the company becomes bigger than Amazon. Depending on how you evaluate the historical Malian emperor Mansa Musa, Musk may be the richest person to ever live. Among pro-capitalist pundits, Musk’s ascension to trillionaire status has been the occasion for a round of sycophantic applause, as they all rush to tell us why it’s good for one individual to control this much of the world’s resources. At Fox News, we’re told that Musk “earned every penny,” and is living proof that “capitalism continues to reward individuals who create extraordinary value.” Similarly, an op-ed in the Los Angeles Times tells us that his SpaceX fortune is “a testament to human ingenuity, immigrant success and American greatness.” The National Review offers “Three Cheers For Elon Musk,” calling criticism of his hyper-wealth “revolting. Repulsive. Grotesque. Un-American.” Now, there are all kinds of political and economic reasons why these claims are wrong, and we’ve discussed them at some length elsewhere. Two of the most important are that by hoarding wealth, billionaires and now trillionaires are actively keeping other people in poverty, making the whole thing monstrously unethical, and that their vast fortunes allow them to buy political power and make a mockery of the word “democracy.” Both of these things are true of Musk, who has bragged about using his wealth to get Donald Trump elected and likely killed hundreds of thousands of people across Africa with his “DOGE” aid cuts. (If you start to count the lives Musk could save if he put his money to good use, the numbers get even more staggering.) But another, morbidly fascinating aspect of this whole moment is that, despite possessing wealth that rivals the emperors of the ancient world, Musk’s existence is a bizarre and cursed one in many important ways. His personal relationships with the people closest to him, by all appearances, are dysfunctional and abusive to varying degrees. He desperately wants to be adored by the public, but with every attempt, their approval slips further from his grasp. Instead of enjoying his money and leisure, he spends his waking hours obsessing over racist conspiracy theories and paranoid fantasies about the end of the world. And to add the final insult, he doesn’t evenhave a trillion dollars in any real sense; he just has to spend a lot of time and energy keeping up an elaborate fiction that he does. In a way, Musk’s fans are right: he’s a perfect example of capitalism at work, with its relentless drive for growth and acquisition at the expense of everything else. It’s just that those are terrible principles to base a human life on. You Can’t Buy Human Connection   It’s an old truism that money can’t buy the things that truly matter in life. This is only sort of the case. Money can certainly buy you a lot of the necessities that make it easier to be happy, like stable housing, leisure time, and better health, and research suggests that up until you hit about $100,000 per year in income, money can indeed improve your life satisfaction. But it’s also true that just because you’re wealthy, it doesn’t mean anyone will like you, especially if your money and status corrupt your ability to have healthy relations with other people. Elon Musk’s first wife, Justine Wilson, has recounted what it was like to be married to him, and it was about as unpleasant as you might expect. Musk was initially charming, but she says that there was a disturbing warning sign when he told her during a dance at their wedding reception that “I am the alpha in this relationship.” Unfortunately, she said, “the will to compete and dominate that made him so successful in business did not magically shut off when he came home,” and in their family “Elon's judgment overruled mine, and he was constantly remarking on the ways he found me lacking.” When she frequently reminded him that she was his wife, not an employee, he would apparently reply “If you were my employee I would fire you.” Despite their “dream lifestyle, privileged and surreal,” Musk was a terrible husband, and she felt “disposable.” Wilson told him she wanted “equality, partnership, and “to love and be loved.” He was unwilling to provide them, and told her in effect that “our status quo works for me, so it should work for you.” When she made clear that it didn’t, he divorced her the next day. Within weeks of filing for divorce in 2008, Musk was dating the much-younger British actress Talulah Riley. The two married, then divorced, then married again, then divorced again, and Musk’s second wife, like his first, felt “she had given up her own career, while he frequently abandoned her for his.” Perhaps the trillionaire’s most high-profile relationship has been with the musician Grimes, with whom he shares three children—X Æ A-Xii, Exa Dark Sideræl, and Techno Mechanicus. (To be fair, some of the blame for the naming may belong to Grimes, who now says she’s changed Exa Dark Siderael’s name to simply the letter “y” or a question mark, representing “the eternal question… and such.”) This relationship, too, ended badly, spilling out onto Twitter, with Grimes reporting that she had been going bankrupt in a massive custody battle with Musk. These are not Musk’s only children. The prolific breeder has at least 14 by various mothers. (Plus those to whom he gives his sperm away, whose numbers are unknown.) Musk has made it clear that he values quantity of procreative output over the quality of his relationships with his kids. Ever the student of history, he decided to populate the world with as many of his genetic offspring as possible, reportedly “after reading that Genghis Khan had done something similar.” (Good role model, Genghis Khan.) He is terrified of population decline, and “really wants smart people to have kids.” Musk appears to hold the pure genetic determinist view that what matters is not whether you’re involved with a child’s life but whether you have Good Smart Person Genes, which he believes he does. He also reportedly believes that “your wealth is directly linked to your IQ,” and so encouraged “all the rich men he knew” to reproduce. Unsurprisingly, Musk goes about this project in the creepiest way imaginable, sliding into women’s DMs on the social media platform he owns, Twitter/X. The Wall Street Journal reports that he replies to lesser-known users and “sometimes interacts through direct messages, some of whom he eventually solicits to have his babies.” Social media influencer Tiffany Fong, for instance, noticed that Musk “started liking and replying to her posts,” driving engagement and revenue to her account, and then “sent her a direct message asking if she was interested in having his child,” even though they had never met in person. Fong declined, and when Musk found out that she had told others about his offer, he chastised her and unfollowed her, leading her new earnings to evaporate. Musk has even preyed on women who have worked for him, with a former employee saying he “asked her on multiple occasions to have his babies.” Shivon Zilis, a Neuralink executive and former project director at Tesla, testified in a court proceeding that Musk “was encouraging everyone around him at that time to have kids and he'd noticed I did not,” so he “offered to make a donation.” Zilis went on to have four of Musk’s children, and attained “special status” among the mothers of his “legion” (his name for his progeny) because he actually spends some time with her. Zilis has said that “I can’t possibly think of genes I would prefer for my children.” But note that she did not say “I can’t possibly think of a man I would prefer to raise my children with.” According to the Wall Street Journal, Zilis moved to “a compound in Austin where Musk imagined the women and his growing number of babies would all live among multiple residences,” although Grimes reportedly refused to move to the property. In 2022, Business Insider reported that Musk exposed himself to a flight attendant on his jet, rubbed her leg, and offered to buy her a horse if she would give him a hand job. (Note that many men do not have to offer to exchange horses for hand jobs, because there are women in the world willing to have sex with them for free, due to their winning personalities. Musk, lacking such an asset, must resort to equine bribery.) Tesla ended up paying the woman $250,000 to keep quiet about the incident. After the story broke, SpaceX employees posted “an internal letter protesting what they viewed as the company’s failure to take harassment allegations seriously,” after which eight of them were fired, leading them to file a complaint with the NLRB. It has to be said, this set of psychosexual preoccupations bears a striking resemblance to those of Musk’s fellow oligarch, the late Jeffrey Epstein. Musk seems to have a higher age preference, as all of the women he’s been publicly involved with have been over 18 (for instance, Riley was 22 and Musk was 37 when they began dating.) But like Musk, Epstein reportedly hoped to “seed the human race with his DNA by impregnating women” on a large scale, and had a compound of his own at Zorro Ranch in New Mexico for that purpose. Like Musk, much of his harassment took place on a private plane, where the women in question were a captive audience. There are even emails between the two, sent on Christmas Day in 2013, where Musk rather pathetically begged to visit Epstein’s properties. The common denominator between the two men is treating women as things to acquire and collect, rather than people. It’s a form of perversity that’s really only available to the super-rich. Musk is an objectively terrible father to his “legion.” Many of his children he appears to have little interest in communicating with at all. When he was asked what was so great about having children, he said that kids were “delightful” but “struggled to come up with any other reasons that had anything to do with building a relationship with the children themselves.” Musk has ignored Grimes, who had pleaded to keep their son X out of the limelight and protect his privacy, instead dragging his toddler in front of TV cameras repeatedly. The worst example of Musk’s parenting, though, is his disavowal of his 22-year-old trans daughter, Vivian Jenna Wilson, whom he has publicly condemned, saying “she was ‘not a girl’ and was figuratively ‘dead,’” alleging that “he had been ‘tricked’ into authorizing trans-related medical treatment for her.” Musk’s transphobia is so extreme that he says he got into right-wing politics specifically because of Wilson, and his public attacks on her are even more galling given that when he comments negatively about someone online they tend to receive threats. For her part, Wilson says that her father “would harass her for exhibiting feminine traits,” on one trip “constantly yelling at me viciously because my voice was too high.” He was neglectful and absent, but also “cruel” and “cold” when present, “uncaring and narcissistic,” as well as “quick to anger.” (This is consistent with accounts of how Musk treats his employees as well.) Wilson notes that she doesn’t actually know exactly how many half-siblings she has, along with the extraordinary fact that “if I had a nickel for every time I found out I had half siblings through Reddit, I'd have two nickels... which isn't a lot but it's weird that it happened twice, right?” The influencer Ashley St. Clair, who had one of Musk’s children in 2024, said that while Musk seemed “very normal” before she got pregnant, “it just got so f—king weird.” When the child was born, Musk requested to keep his name off the birth certificate, while one of his deputies pressured her “to sign documents keeping the father of the baby and details regarding her relationship with Musk secret in return for[…] a one-time fee of $15 million for a home and living expenses, plus an additional $100,000 a month until the baby turned 21.” But after St. Clair expressed support for Musk’s trans daughter, Musk said he was “filing for full custody today” because her “support for trans ideology meant that she was ‘implying she might transition a one-year-old boy.’” He also “sought a gag order in New York to force Ms. St. Clair to stop speaking publicly.” In other words, in addition to his cruel treatment of his trans daughter, he threatened to keep one of his other children from seeing their mom because St. Clair disavowed transphobia. Again, the theme of treating people as possessions returns, because Musk is interested in his children only if they turn out the way he prefers; otherwise, he’ll cast them aside as he might a defective rocket engine. Building a healthy, loving family, then, and building normal human relationships, are something Musk has no interest in, and likely couldn’t achieve even if he did. His vast wealth allows him to treat people like dirt and suffer few consequences. When the mother of one of his children displeases him, he can threaten to ruin her with a costly custody battle. When he is accused of sexual harassment, he can cut a check. But the end result of all of this is multiple failed marriages and an ever-growing brood of biological children who will lack any kind of meaningful parent-child relationship with their dad. You Can’t Buy Cool   If his relationships to the people close to him are a train wreck, Musk’s relationship with the public isn’t much better. As the years go on, it’s become clear that he badly wants to be seen as cool, funny, and popular, and yet the harder he tries to win everyone’s admiration, the less cool he becomes. Lately, his public antics just exude a desperate, sweaty energy that makes him painful to watch. There was the godawful “let that sink in” joke that he used to announce his arrival to Twitter’s headquarters, carrying a physical porcelain sink; the stupid X-shaped jumping jack he kept doing for a while, apparently to resemble the logo of “X the Everything App”; the cowboy hat incident; the photo he posted of his bedside table with a huge gun and four cans of Diet Coke on it; the poem (Maybe religion’s not so bad / To keep you from being sad). In his comprehensive, largely flattering biography, Walter Isaacson writes that Musk’s “jokes tended to be filled with smirking references to 69, other sex acts, body fluids, pooping, farts, dope smoking, and topics that would crack up a dorm room of stoned freshmen.” (More like a classroom of sixth-graders.) At one point, Musk admitted that he pays other people to play video games for him, so he’ll quickly get the highest scores and levels and Twitch streamers will see him as a “living god of video games.” For him, the point is not to enjoy the games, but to acquire whatever token or icon marks you as having won them, and thus earn the admiration of nerds who watch livestreams all day. And he couldn’t even get that, because when Musk attempted to stream himself playing Path of Exile 2last year, the audience trolled him relentlessly, posting “YOU HAVE NO REAL FRIENDS AND WILL DIE ALONE” over and over in the chat box. But just caring about this kind of thing in the first place is the pathetic part, and apparently no amount of money can fix that. In fact, the money itself may be the problem. Once you reach a certain level of wealth, if you’re not careful, you become surrounded by “yes men” who tell you everything you come up with is brilliant, no matter how non-brilliant it actually is. It’s a familiar pattern with American celebrities and financial elites. Howard Hughes had his mansion full of urine jars. Michael Jackson had his oxygen chamber and monkey, and his staff largely overlooked his questionable relations with children. Ye has his song where he rhymed “they don’t understand the things I say on Twitter” with “Heil Hitler.” (Notably, Musk and the artist formerly named Kanye West were friends for over a decade.) This is the kind of behavior where, if any non-rich person tried it, they’d be socially ostracized, sent for mental treatment, or at the very least told to shut up. But where an ordinary person might be considered “weird,” “creepy,” or “banned from the mall,” the rich are merely “eccentric,” and get to carry on making a spectacle of themselves indefinitely. The closest Musk ever came to being cool was in the early years, when he was still something of an underdog compared to the CEOs of the big aerospace and auto companies. Today, that’s gone, and his personal concept of “cool” is clearly just stuff he sees in video games, comic books, and YouTube and Reddit posts. To him, the height of “cool” is to pretend to be Iron Man, or post “epic memes” all day. It’s left him with a small, fanatical fanbase of similarly maladjusted internet guys, and he seems genuinely confused why everyone else in the world doesn’t love him, too. One person who is cool is Musk’s daughter, Vivian Wilson, who is a proud leftist and opponent of billionaires who has posed for Vogue and is fronting major fashion campaigns. Ashley St. Clair has even speculated that part of the reason Musk has attacked Wilson is “jealousy,” that he is “just mad that Vivian is a million times cooler than he will ever be.” Even a trillion dollars cannot make a bitter, reactionary, terminally-online middle-aged deadbeat dad cooler than his fashion icon trans daughter. You Can’t Buy Peace of Mind   Really, Musk doesn’t even seem to be enjoying his massive wealth that much. Many people, if they got hold of even a few million dollars—let alone a trillion—would be napping on a beach somewhere people have never heard of Twitter. Instead, Musk seems to spend a huge chunk of his free time on the app, responding to the most racist posts he can find. In that way, his life is not very different from that of the stereotypical, unemployed loser who lives in a basement and does the same, surrounded by empty Cheeto packets and Monster Energy cans. When you scroll through his feed, the sheer amount of racial fearmongering is overwhelming. Take just a few examples from this June. Here’s Musk saying that “there are large numbers of anti-White hate crimes every day in America,” in a reply to a far-right account called “End Wokeness.” Here he is complaining that “the system is severely biased against Whites,” in response to the news that a white 19-year-old had been sentenced to 19 years in a British prison for “attempting to behead a Kurdish barber with an axe.” On another occasion, he retweeted someone called “Rothmus” who said that “the welfare state has been more destructive to the black family than slavery.” (This is a particularly offensive bit of nonsense, as enslaved people routinely had their young children taken from them by force and sold at auction, while the welfare state does not do that.) More often, Musk simply responds with “concerning” or “!!” to any post that highlights a crime committed by a Black person or an immigrant, bringing it to the attention of his 240 million followers—and by extension the entire app, since he has reportedly instructed the software engineers to boost his posts, whether anyone wants to see them or not.   Just one of many, many examples.   The irony is that Musk is, by definition, one of the most powerful people in the world, and he’s visibly terrified of the least powerful. According to the Washington Post, Musk posted about “race and his concerns about perceived threats to Whiteness” 850 times between October 2025 and April 2026, for an average of four racist tweets per day. He has turned a major social media network into a sewer, and appears to spend hours every day posting this bile from his own phone. That’s approaching what Victorian physicians would have called a monomania, or an idée fixe—a singular, unhealthy obsession that consumes one’s life. But it’s not quite fair to say Musk is single-mindedly obsessed with racial panic. He's also obsessed with the end of the world, and seems to believe that he’s destined to play a messianic role in preserving humanity from otherwise certain doom. Musk told St. Clair that he was trying to produce his legion of children in anticipation of a coming cataclysm. “To reach legion-level before the apocalypse, we will need to use surrogates.” (Will the children die in the apocalypse? Will they be hidden in a bunker? It is not clear what Musk intends.) A key part of the sales pitch for SpaceX is that it will allow H. Sapiens to become a “multiplanetary species,” giving us a backup world (probably Mars, but possibly the Moon too) in case the Earth becomes uninhabitable. The exact cause of the impending crisis is a little vague. Sometimes Musk says superintelligent AI could “kill us all”; sometimes it’s a nuclear war with Russia; sometimes it’s “low birth rates,” which he claims will “end civilization.” The details don’t seem to matter as much as the apocalyptic frame of mind itself. Not that Musk seems to find humanity itself particularly worth saving. He is not Zohran Mamdani, who seems most at home in huge crowds and among street food vendors and taxi drivers. In fact, Musk seems to abhor being around everyday people. Part of his gripe against public transit is that it involves being around “a bunch of random strangers, one of who might be a serial killer.” He wondered why someone would “want to get on something with a lot of other people,” which is part of why he posits ridiculous unworkable schemes to crisscross cities with auto tunnels—the concept of a train or bus is abhorrently collectivist. The feeling of disdain is mutual: polling shows Musk is the least-liked public figure in America among the general public.     The Money is Kind of Fake Anyway   There’s an old Dr. Seuss cartoon from World War II—not, thankfully, one of the racist ones about the Japanese—that depicts Adolf Hitler with a megaphone strapped to his head. He’s chanting increasingly implausible numbers of “Russians Killed” to Goebbels, who’s banging away frantically at a typewriter: “Million! Billion! Trillion! Rillion!” It’s a fitting analogy for what’s going on with Elon Musk, and not only because he keeps lending his support to German far-right parties. After a certain point, the superlative numbers cease to mean much of anything, and the whole concept of “more money” becomes kind of fake. There’s no meaningful difference, in terms of your quality of life, between having “500 billion dollars” and having “a trillion dollars”; there’s no product or property you could buy at the second point that you couldn’t at the first. For all practical purposes, $500 billion was already “unlimited money.” In that way, becoming a trillionaire doesn’t actually give you anything, other than a score-keeping exercise against other rich guys, like Jeff Bezos or Bertrand Arnault. It’s a hollow victory; a plastic trophy that says “I won capitalism” on the side would do just as well. Not that Musk actually has “a trillion dollars” in any commonly understood sense, or ever could. We’re not talking about a Scrooge McDuck style money pile in a vault somewhere, or even a bank account with a balance that reads “$1,000,000,000,000.” The “wealth” being tallied consists mostly of shares in SpaceX and Tesla, Musk’s two biggest and most famous companies, together with miscellaneous other ownership stakes in Twitter/X, the obnoxiously-named “Boring Company,” the sketchy Neuralink brain chips, and so on. Maybe he has a few leftover pocket emeralds, but mostly it’s just the hypothetical value of stocks, which is based in turn on the hypothetical future profits of the companies. In a word, it’s all gambling. Really, Musk couldn’t access “a trillion dollars” if he tried. He’s trapped in a paradox: if he attempts to sell all those shares, or even if there’s a believable rumor that he will, it would be a blaring red disaster signal for the future of the companies, leading their value to plummet almost instantly. It’s a funny kind of “wealth” that only stays “wealth” as long as you don’t touch it. And because the $1 trillion number is so comically large, it’s unclear if enough dollars even exist for the transaction to be possible. According to the Federal Reserve, there is currently about $2.4 trillion of physical currency in circulation, so if Musk wanted to collect his riches in cash, he’d take home roughly half of all the existing bills and coins. Add in all the “reserve balances” that commercial banks deposit with the Federal Reserve itself, and you get a “monetary base” of about $5.4 trillion for the United States. Expand that to the “M2 monetary base,” which includes things like savings deposits and money market funds, and you’re looking at roughly $22.8 trillion. Whichever figure you choose, $1 trillion is a comically large fraction of the overall existing money for one guy to “own,” and if he tried to actually lay hands on it, it would probably cause serious structural problems for the entire monetary system. If we want to be all Marxist about this, we can invoke the term Marx himself used for such things: “fictitious capital.” As old Karl described it, this pseudo-wealth “exists only in the form of claims to capital,” or claims on hypothetical future income. It can be traded and exchanged endlessly, racking up enormous values on paper, but can’t actually be “realized in the form of commodities” at any one time. For the overall global economy, fictitious capital is a problem, because if the gap between the on-paper value of the wealth that’s supposedly circulating and what’s actually being produced gets too big, it won’t be sustainable. That’s a very simplified version of what happened in 2008, when too large a portion of the economy was based on dodgy “subprime loans” and “derivatives” that could never actually be repaid or collected. But for an individual like Musk, to be a paper trillionaire with a fortune of mostly fictitious capital must be a bizarre experience. Essentially, Musk’s entire financial status is based on a series of illusions and propaganda narratives. If he wants to keep it, he has to maintain the expectation that he’ll some day deliver actual, material goods and services equal to the gargantuan valuations of his companies. He has to promise to put a human being on Mars in ten years (that was 14 years ago), or build humanoid robots that can do all your household tasks (one model was just a guy in a Spandex suit), or create a version of the Cybertruck that doesn’t suck (a definitional impossibility). The claims keep getting more grandiose as the stock values climb, and the stress of keeping the whole house of cards upright just doesn’t seem worth it. You’d Feel Sorry for Him, if Not For the Body Count   From a certain angle, Musk can seem like a pitiable figure. He has been given the whole world, but has not managed to achieve the things that really make for a fulfilling life. Despite possessing more wealth than the greatest emperors and potentates, he will still “brood for years about slights” on social media. By all accounts, he did also have a difficult childhood, albeit one cushioned by the privileges enjoyed by white people in Apartheid-era South Africa. He was raised by an awful father, Errol Musk, who has been accused of monstrous acts of sexual abuse against children, resents Elon in particular, and according to Musk’s sister, would spend hours “calling you worthless, pathetic, making scarring and evil comments, not allowing you to leave.” (Elon said of his father: “Almost every crime you can possibly think of, he has done. Almost every evil thing you could possibly think of, he has done. It's so terrible, you can't believe it.”) But even if “hurt people hurt people,” it doesn’t make Musk’s behavior any less horrifying. Musk isn’t particularly philanthropic, of course. His Musk Foundation sometimes doesn’t even give away the minimum amount of money required by law, and in 2023 its largest gift went to another nonprofit called The Foundation run by his associates, which itself runs a private elementary school for children of his employees. The Times reports Musk’s giving “has been haphazard and largely self-serving — making him eligible for enormous tax breaks and helping his businesses.” He did resist Peter Thiel’s pressure to withdraw from Warren Buffett’s Giving Pledge, but the reasoning Thiel reports he gave was not particularly altruistic: “What am I supposed to do – give it to my children? I certainly can’t give it to my trans daughter; that would be bad.” But Musk isn’t just stingy with his own fortune. When he took a role in the federal government he deliberately used his position to take food and medicine from the world’s poorest people, gleefully destroying the agency that provided U.S. medical aid to needy countries, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Musk is a supporter of brutal imperialism (“we will coup whoever we want”), and even flirts with outright neo-Nazism. He is a booster of some of the most hateful and dangerous politicians around the world, and even said that the serial sexual abuser Andrew Tate would make a good U.K. prime minister. Musk bears a significant responsibility for the second Trump presidency. He vowed that even though “I can’t be President… I can help Trump defeat Biden and I will.” And he did, by spending hundreds of millions of dollars on the election. Every horror we are now experiencing, from killings by ICE agents and the building of huge immigrant concentration camps to the brazen attempts to loot the public treasury, are squarely the responsibility of Elon Musk. So there are about 8 billion people on Earth we should feel sorry for before we feel even an ounce of sympathy for Musk, as pathetic a figure as he may be. And yet his entire existence is a cautionary tale, a living moral fable. Yes, our primary focus should be on how capitalism affects the lives of the global poor and the working class, because they are the vast majority of humanity. But Musk shows us that capitalism isn’t good for the rich, either. Like a black hole or a neutron star, the gravitational pull of all that money warps their lives into shapes they would never otherwise have taken. It turns them grotesque, sucks away their joy and humanity, and kills their ability to relate normally to others. Removing Musk’s outlandish wealth and power is not just necessary for the preservation of democracy. It’s a favor to him, and offers the only hope for his redemption.  

  • Eel Smuggling Is The Organized Crime Racket You’ve Never Heard Of

    Despite being the world's most trafficked animal, the European eel receives surprisingly little sympathy. It lacks the mammalian charisma of the creatures whose plights dominate conservation campaigns; among them the shy, helpless pangolin and the stoically intelligent elephant. By contrast, the eel is viewed by many as a source of revulsion: a slimy, writhing reason to stay out of the water. Yet behind inscrutable eyes, it harbors many secrets. This is the story of how an elusive and often misunderstood fish found itself at the center of an international smuggling network.

  • Kill Your Doomerism with Citizen Science

    On one of the first proper spring days in New York City, I found myself wandering through Broad Channel, a quiet, strikingly conservative neighborhood in Queens, to watch Park Rangers drill bits of plastic into the sides of mating Horseshoe Crabs.

  • You Can’t Have Both Democracy and Billionaires

    “What exactly is wrong with the wealthy?” law professor John O. McGinnis asks in Why Democracy Needs The Rich. McGinnis thinks the 1 percent have been unfairly maligned by leftists like Bernie Sanders, and are in need of a vigorous defense. The rich, he says, are productive and useful members of society. If we redistribute their wealth, we only impoverish ourselves. Even those of us who will never be rich ourselves benefit from the presence of oligarchs.

  • “I Want No States”: Norman Finkelstein on the Future of Gaza

    In the second half of his interview with Current Affairs, Dr. Norman Finkelstein discusses the changing political landscape surrounding Palestine, the growing critiques of Israel among right-wing commentators, and why he remains unconvinced by both the one-state and two-state solutions. The political scientist also explains why his latest book, Gaza's Gravediggers: An Inquiry Into Corruption in High Places, focuses less on Israeli propaganda and more than on the failures of prominent human rights organizations to stop a genocide. Because these intuitions are meant to possess a certain "moral authority," Finkelstein says, "it's those betrayals that anger me 10,000 times more."