Articles & Videos

13038 items
All PoliticsPolicyEconomyRights & JusticeInternationalClimate & EnvironmentTechnologyHealthMediaCulture & Society

Select Date Range

"SPINELESS SELLOUTS!" Dem Voters RAIL Against Their Own Party
14:14
Breaking Points • 4 weeks ago

"SPINELESS SELLOUTS!" Dem Voters RAIL Against Their Own Party

Trump’s Needlessly Expensive Plan to Replace WHO Tool Revealed
New Republic • 4 weeks ago

Trump’s Needlessly Expensive Plan to Replace WHO Tool Revealed

It won’t be bigger or better, but the Trump administration is reportedly working to create a U.S. dupe of the World Health Organization.The Department of Health and Human Services is proposing a plan that would cost taxpayers $2 billion a year to recreate the same systems that the country had access to when it was a member of the WHO, according to officials that spoke with The Washington Post Thursday.The Trump administration pulled the United States out of the WHO on January 22. In a statement, DHS blamed the exit on the global public health entity’s response to the Covid-19 pandemic. Yet Donald Trump—who railed against the WHO for years—saw it differently. On his first day back in office, Trump chalked the withdrawal up to “unfairly onerous payments,” claiming that the cost of membership within the WHO was disproportionately shouldered by the U.S. But the federal directive has not quelled nationwide demand for health data. Over the last several weeks, Illinois and California both sidestepped the government to independently join the WHO’s Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, or GOARN, in newly localized efforts to stay abreast of changes in global health.The White House’s plan to recreate the WHO’s health surveillance operation would involve the creation of laboratories, data-sharing networks, and rapid-response systems that the U.S. abandoned when it withdrew from the WHO last month—only this time, it will cost Americans much, much more.The total cost could be as much as three times the price of America’s WHO membership. Citing figures in the proposal, U.S. officials told the Post that America’s contributions to the WHO fell somewhere between 15 and 18 percent of the entity’s total annual funding of $3.7 billion. On the high end, that would represent a $666 million annual membership fee.Meanwhile, the Trump administration worked decisively last year to gut USAID, which did much of the work that the White House is planning to do with its slapdash WHO replacement.But the Trump administration would apparently prefer to spend more, not less, for an inferior product.Public health researchers were appalled by the initiative, arguing that the U.S.-led operation would not serve as an adequate or effective replacement to the WHO’s data-sharing program.“Spending two to three times the cost to create what we already had access to makes absolutely no sense in terms of fiscal stewardship,” Tom Inglesby, director of the Center for Health Security at the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, told the Post. “We’re not going to get the same quality or breadth of information we would have by being in the WHO, or have anywhere the influence we had.”

Coming This Fall: Disputed Elections—and a New Supreme Court Nominee?
New Republic • Feb 19, 2026

Coming This Fall: Disputed Elections—and a New Supreme Court Nominee?

Samuel Alito, a suspected Dobbs and Hobby Lobby leaker, wine aficionado, and far-right flag waver, has a new book coming this fall. Ordinarily, a Supreme Court justice’s book is an opportunity to line their pockets with a hefty advance, enjoy the perks of a lecture tour, and sit for gentle interviews with handpicked partisans who gullibly swallow the usual line about how they’re students of the Constitution, not robed, opportunistic hacks. Yet The Nation’s Elie Mystal noticed something unusual about the publication date of Alito’s forthcoming doorstopper, So Ordered: An Originalist’s View of the Constitution, the Court, and the Country. It’s scheduled to hit bookstores on October 6, the second day of the court’s 2026–27 term. Alito, whose appreciation for private jet travel is well established, would ordinarily be due at his day job.Unless, Mystal suggests, Alito plans to retire. Certainly, Alito must be enjoying life as a leader of the conservative supermajority. You know, making it more difficult to vote, overturning reproductive rights, and gutting the regulatory state, all while being feted each summer at a religious summit in Rome or hosted by a princess at a European castle. Yet Alito, 75, is also enough of a savvy political analyst to understand that this could be his last chance to preserve his seat for conservatives for decades to come. For the time being, Republicans remain favored to hold the U.S. Senate this fall. But what if Democrats ride a blue wave and take control, summon their inner Mitch McConnell to blockade any late-term Trump selection, and take back the White House in 2028? In that case, Alito might then need to white-knuckle it through six years of annual physicals to ensure the GOP retains its current edge. It’s a tough call: hobnob with European aristocrats and feel the thrill of executing the innocent if they, whoopsie, miss an appeal deadline, or allow some younger, red-robed Federalist Society/MAGA partisan the opportunity to abet pay discrimination against women. As Democrats ruefully learned in September 2020, riding it out, fingers crossed, is a really dopey strategy.So, given the high stakes, and the court’s role as the true source of GOP political power, the smart money suggests that Alito may well step down, with an eye on the long game. After all, Republicans have long understood the power of each Supreme Court seat. In the end, Republicans understand that what matters isn’t the brilliance of any individual justice. There is no indispensable justice. Power flows from ensuring that they are replaced by someone who wears the same color robe.Republicans play this game far better than Democrats. Back in 2013, when Democrats controlled the Senate and the White House, liberals with an eye toward locking in power encouraged then-Justices Stephen Breyer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg, both known to have health difficulties, to step down and hand their seat to any younger, replacement-level jurist. Louder, less strategic voices instead built a cult of personality around Ginsburg, crafted dissent collars to sell on Etsy, and dismissed any calls for a justice with pancreatic cancer to step down as sexist. These deep thinkers hopefully appreciate their Christmas cards from Justice Amy Coney Barrett.An Alito retirement makes perfect sense. He has dedicated his life’s work to the conservative legal movement. A well-timed retirement allows a president of his own party to fill the vacancy. The incentives are obvious to all. (Well, maybe except RBG.) Every justice appointed since Clarence Thomas in 1991 who has left the court voluntarily has timed their departure to allow a president of the same party to name their successor. Congress must fix this. It is dangerous enough for the rule of law that the high court has been captured by ideologues determined to use it to impose a radical, religious agenda upon a representative democracy that would roundly reject those outcomes at the ballot box. No nine people should hold this kind of veto-proof, extra-legislative authority for life and then be allowed to choose who replaces them as robed God for the next four decades.The nation badly needs Supreme Court reform. It should be enlarged to protect the Constitution and the rule of law. There should be ethics codes so that hidden, cozy financial relationships between justices and right-wing billionaires with business before the court are disallowed, along with the private planes, tuition payments, luxury vacations, real estate deals, and European junkets from which the justices and their extended families benefit. There should be term limits and a mandatory retirement age so that no single person or political party can blockade themselves on the court for life.An unelected supermajority of six, the masterfully achieved goal of five decades of conservative scheming, bought and paid for by billionaires, wielding its power swiftly and steadily on behalf of wealthy donors, the religious right, and the Republican Party has created an existential crisis for democracy and majority rule. The American public understands this: The court’s credibility has cratered to its lowest ratings ever in recent opinion polls, which often show that fewer than four in 10 Americans view the court favorably.Alito, Thomas, and other conservatives insist that the only thing partisan about their rulings is the critique that they are partisans. They playact befuddlement that they might possibly be viewed as anything but scholars following the original intent of the Constitution. This they either expect us to believe, even as Christian nationalist and distress flags hang in the Alitos’ front yard, or they are simply so safely and permanently ensconced in power as to no longer care. There are many reasons not to believe the conservative justices when they deny being partisan actors. But strategic retirements like this, if it happens, might be the most compelling argument. After all, if justices of either side were simply following the Constitution and the rule of law, the political party that appoints them shouldn’t make that much difference. Few among us remain this naïve. Large majorities back the obvious fix. Congress could impose term limits. Each justice could be limited to 18 years on the bench, with each president receiving two selections during each term. The stakes of presidential elections would be clear. Historical accidents like Donald Trump receiving three appointments and Jimmy Carter none would come to an end. There would be no unseemly deal-making between the White House and the justices, such as that suggested in reporting about arrangements between Trump officials and Justice Anthony Kennedy before Kennedy stepped down and was replaced by Brett Kavanaugh, one of his former clerks.Back in 2010, Chief Justice John Roberts told C-SPAN that the “most important thing for the public to understand is that we’re not a political branch of government. They do not elect us. If they do not like what we are doing, it’s more or less just too bad.” But we can, and we must, act. Reining in this imperious, arrogant court might be the most important first step toward placing this nation on a road toward a rebuilt, strengthened democracy. Putting an end to these phony strategic retirements—by both sides—would be an obvious place to start.

Saagar: Trump Most Pro DEGENERATE President Of ALL TIME
16:37
Breaking Points • Feb 19, 2026

Saagar: Trump Most Pro DEGENERATE President Of ALL TIME

IHIP News: 🚨 Trump's INNER CIRCLE of PSYCHOTIC Billionaire OLIGARCHS Want Democracy DESTROYED!!
12:02
I've Had It Podcast • Feb 19, 2026

IHIP News: 🚨 Trump's INNER CIRCLE of PSYCHOTIC Billionaire OLIGARCHS Want Democracy DESTROYED!!

12...348349350351352...14481449