Articles & Videos

14140 items
All PoliticsPolicyEconomyRights & JusticeInternationalClimate & EnvironmentTechnologyHealthMediaCulture & Society

Select Date Range

EXPLOSIVE AUDIO: Epstein Pushes Palantir To Former Israeli PM
20:55
Breaking Points • Feb 2, 2026

EXPLOSIVE AUDIO: Epstein Pushes Palantir To Former Israeli PM

Elon, Reid Hoffman, Bill Gates: Billionaire Epstein Lies REVEALED
22:02
Breaking Points • Feb 2, 2026

Elon, Reid Hoffman, Bill Gates: Billionaire Epstein Lies REVEALED

IHIP News: Chuck Schumer IMPEACHMENT? MAGA Spreads FAKE AI Photos of Zohran Mamdani & Epstein!
19:05
I've Had It Podcast • Feb 2, 2026

IHIP News: Chuck Schumer IMPEACHMENT? MAGA Spreads FAKE AI Photos of Zohran Mamdani & Epstein!

Epstein Survivors Furious After DOJ Screws Up File Redactions
New Republic • Feb 2, 2026

Epstein Survivors Furious After DOJ Screws Up File Redactions

Attorneys representing victims of sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein are appealing to federal court to get the federal government to take down millions of documents related to Epstein, saying that the government failed to properly redact victims’ information.In a letter to New York federal judges Richard Berman and Paul Engelmayer, who are overseeing the cases of Epstein and his accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, lawyers Brittany Henderson and Brad Edwards requested an “immediate judicial intervention” over victims’ personal information being included in the newly released files.“Within the past 48 hours, the undersigned alone has reported thousands of redaction failures on behalf of nearly 100 individual survivors whose lives have been turned upside down by DOJ’s latest release,” the letter states.Henderson and Edwards, who represent over 200 alleged victims of Epstein, blasted the Justice Department for its failure, considering that protecting victims of Epstein is required by law.“There is no conceivable degree of institutional incompetence sufficient to explain the scale, consistency, and persistence of the failures that occurred—particularly where the sole task ordered by the Court and repeatedly emphasized by DOJ was simple: redact known victim names before publication,” Henderson and Edwards wrote.“DOJ cannot plausibly characterize this as error, negligence, or bureaucratic failure. The task was straightforward: take the list of known victims and redact those names everywhere they appear,” the letter states. “When DOJ believed it was ready to publish, it needed only to type each victim’s name into its own search function. Any resulting hit should have been redacted before publication. Had DOJ done that, the harm would have been avoided.”The lawyers mention multiple instances where victims’ names were left unredacted, including one minor’s name allegedly “revealed 20 times in a single document.” When those mistakes were flagged and told to the DOJ, the lawyers said, only three of the mentions were redacted, with the other 17 left untouched. In another instance, one email mentions 32 underage victims with only one of them redacted, while some FBI forms included in the file release left full names unredacted.Some of the victims testified anonymously in the letter that they received death threats and harassment from the media since the files publicly identified them.“The release of this information is not only profoundly distressing and retraumatizing, but it also places me and my child at potential physical risk,” one victim said.The latest Epstein file release on Friday appears to be full of errors and negligent redacting. Nearly 40 nude photos of women, possibly underage, were mistakenly released unredacted, while an innocuous photo of President Trump speaking somehow was redacted. And the full batch of files has yet to be released, despite a legal deadline set six weeks ago. Is the DOJ taking the release of the Epstein files seriously?

White House’s AI-Edited Arrest Photo Comes Back to Bite Them in Court
New Republic • Feb 2, 2026

White House’s AI-Edited Arrest Photo Comes Back to Bite Them in Court

The White House’s horrible, AI-doctored photograph of a Minnesota protester was used as evidence Monday that Donald Trump’s administration is acting in “nakedly obvious bad faith.” In a four-page filing, attorney Jordan Kushner argued that the court should modify conditions for the release of his client, Nekima Levy-Armstrong, a civil rights attorney arrested at an anti-ICE protest that disrupted a church service in St. Paul, Minnesota.Kushner claimed that events that occurred after Levy-Armstrong’s arrest had “informed the Court of the government’s bad faith,” and had already influenced the court in declining to place restrictions on her co-defendants, who were released on January 30. Among the list of incidents, Kushner included the White House’s X post featuring “an altered photo of Ms. Levy-Armstrong being arrested to make it falsely appear that she was crying and making her face darker.”Kushner noted that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had posted the original photograph of his client being escorted in handcuffs by law enforcement. More recently, Attorney General Pam Bondi had posted names and mugshots of 16 other protesters, he added. In considering all the reasons to lighten the release restrictions placed on Levy Armstrong, Kushner asked the court to consider “the government’s nakedly obvious bad faith.”

Abu Dhabi expands partnership with NBA
Semafor • Feb 2, 2026

Abu Dhabi expands partnership with NBA

The city will host an NBA Global Academy for high-school-age players, as part of an expanded partnership with the US professional basketball league.

12...669670671672673...15711572