Articles & Videos
Is Kash Patel SCREWING UP Guthrie Investigation?
Saudi replaces key minister amid pressure to attract foreign cash
A government reshuffle puts a Saudi wealth fund executive in charge of bringing in much-needed FDI.
CBP Chief Defends Violent Tactics in Minnesota as “De-Escalation”
The heads of Customs and Border Protection and ICE were grilled by the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee Thursday about the conduct of federal agents.Republican Senator Rand Paul called out the agency heads for what happened on Minneapolis’s streets just prior to Alex Pretti’s killing, specifically a video of agents shoving a woman face down on the ground.CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott equivocated, saying that pushing a woman to the ground “can be” considered a de-escalation tactic, “depending on the circumstances.”“I don’t know what happened before this. If an officer thinks that doing that is going to prevent any kind of a physical encounter, if there’s a weapon or anything else, I’m not saying there is, I’m just saying in certain cases, using hand-to-hand is a de-escalation,” Scott said. Paul didn’t agree with this.“No one in America believes that shoving that woman’s face in the snow was de-escalation, but your officers need to know that they had a verbal encounter with her. She did not place her hands on the officers. She wasn’t trying to get their weapon,” Paul said, asking if it is “proper to physically throw a woman down or throw anyone down” in response to verbal attacks.Scott and Acting ICE Director Todd Lyons eventually both answered no.Rand Paul to ICE officials on moments before Pretti's killing: "No one in America believes that shoving that woman's face in the snow was deescalation." Note that ICE officials then confirm it was improper for her to be thrown down. pic.twitter.com/waC3WQVVuF— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) February 12, 2026After a video was shown of Pretti’s killing, Democratic Senator Gary Peters pointed out how Pretti was beaten with a spray canister before he was shot. He criticized the violence perpetrated by agents, asking if beating someone “with a canister, is that de-escalatory?”The answer from Scott wasn’t encouraging.“What I’m seeing is a subject that’s also not compliant. He’s not following any guidance. He’s fighting back nonstop. I don’t know what they’re saying. I don’t know what’s going on in this situation,” Scott responded.Sen. Peters: “Is beating someone with a spray canister, is that de-escalatory?”CBP Commissioner Rodney Scott: “What I'm seeing is a subject that's also not compliant. He's not following any guidance. He's fighting back nonstop. I don't know what they're saying. I don't know… pic.twitter.com/rvCD9vlL1n— The Bulwark (@BulwarkOnline) February 12, 2026Neither of the agency heads came off well during the hearing, nor did they indicate any changes are coming in how Border Patrol and ICE handles detentions or people protesting against them. Violence has become the norm, even after the outrage following the killings of Renee Good and Pretti. U.S. citizens are routinely detained, either because federal agents are trying to punish them for protesting or because they are being racially profiled as undocumented immigrants.The Trump administration may make a few nods here and there toward de-escalation and lowering tensions, but its mass deportation agenda, complete with violence and hostility toward protesters, remains intact, even with an announced drawdown in Minneapolis. The protesters around the country aren’t going to stop as long as the injustice continues. Will the government finally get a clue?
Bondi’s Paperwork at Epstein Hearing Suggests Trump’s DOJ Is Spying on Congress
Bondi's notes at a House hearing included the search history of a lawmaker who has been reviewing the Epstein files.
EXPOSED: CBP shoots teacher 5 times, attempts coverup
Trump Wipes Out EPA’s Power to Fight Climate Change
President Trump’s Environmental Protection Agency on Thursday rejected scientific evidence that greenhouse gases endanger public health and welfare, undermining a foundational pillar in the fight against climate change.The agency revoked the 2009 endangerment finding, an Obama-era policy that emerged from the 2007 Massachusetts v. EPA Supreme Court case that determined greenhouse gases to be a real public health risk that could be addressed via the Clean Air Act. Repealing the rule affects what the EPA can regulate, from vehicles to the oil and gas industry to major power plants.President Trump claimed that the endangerment finding “severely damaged the American auto industry and massively drove up prices for American consumers.” But this is a massive blow for the institutional fight against climate change—and for our finite environment.Less pollution and emissions oversight will only expedite the negative impacts of climate change that we’ve already experienced. .@POTUS: "Under the Endangerment Finding, they forced the hated start-stop feature onto American consumers... the Endangerment Finding was also used to impose the massive and really very expensive electric vehicle mandate... These crippling restrictions were a major factor in… https://t.co/beXDcODasZ pic.twitter.com/2mWrAFRhnX— Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) February 12, 2026“This decision prioritizes the profits of big oil and gas companies and polluters over clean air and water, the health of kids and all people, and the progress we’ve made to respond to climate change,” Medical Society Consortium on Climate and Health head Lisa Patel told Axios. Legal challenges from the D.C. Court of Appeals are expected soon. This story has been updated.