Articles & Videos
All PoliticsPolicyEconomyCivil RightsJusticeInternationalConflict & SecurityClimate & EnvironmentTechnologyHealthMediaCulture & Society
Is This the End of the Kennedy Myth?
As a television show, Ryan Murphy’s Love Story continues his late-career work in Wikipedia necromancy. The show is a farce designed for audiences who carry a deep grief at not having been able to rent in Yorkville when the getting was good. The people whose lives were harvested for the show, John F. Kennedy Jr. and Carolyn Bessette, deserve clear-eyed acknowledgment and dignity, as all other humans do. But if we’re really being honest about merit and commemoration? These were nice-looking white people with expensive educations and good teeth. You’ll find ’em every weekend in The New York Times’ Vows section. It seems clear that Murphy and Love Story’s other writers feel little need to explain why these people matter: The Kennedy name is enough. But what’s abundantly clear, watching the show, is that it just isn’t anymore. Love Story falters because that name simply doesn’t mean what it used to. JFK Jr.’s family name slalomed him through Andover and Brown and NYU Law. He did a little bit of charity work in India that was presented in the press as if he were a lone Jesuit who had been weaving mosquito nets in Odisha for decades. He stumbled through law school, worked in the Manhattan District Attorney’s office for a few years (his last name the key criterion on his application), and launched George, a magazine that Kendall Roy would have considered a bad idea. (That said, one could argue the vacuous George was ahead of its time in its superficial treatment of politics, which always privileged style over substance and covered it like pop culture.) What made people call him cool and stylish at the time was a literal whitewashing of ’90s Black fashion: a preppy guy wearing backward hats and wayfarers and mixing sneakers with jeans. A dash of N.W.A. for Watch Hill. Bessette worked in publicity and, according to some fashion types online, was a groundbreaking icon in that she wore Miu Miu instead of Halston. Again, these were full and complete human beings who were, presumably, decent to random people whom they encountered. When it comes to cultural virtuosos of ’90s New York, we ain’t talking Nas or Tony Kushner. Love Story, along with the other nuggets floating downstream from the billowing Superfund site of Kennedy material represents what has poisoned Democratic Party politics.Take it from someone whose ancestor Seamus arrived in the port of Philadelphia with two barrels of whiskey and a change of clothes as his worldly possessions: The Kennedy family are the ne plus ultra of how the Irish became white. First-generation thrift; second-generation wealth acquisition by any means necessary. Joseph P. Kennedy first made deals with actual mobster Abner Zwillman, then relentlessly nurtured relationships with elite American institutions like Harvard and Yale and the oldest of the old-guard boarding schools. Calculated flashes of sprezzatura atop the recreational habits of the Social Register—skiing but aggro; boating but loud. The Kennedy magic was a specific kind of ethnic whiteness cultivated and adjusted and laundered. Be pale enough, have your grandparents’ home language be English (as opposed to Italian or Yiddish), pose for enough photos with and party with enough Roosevelts and Vanderbilts—apex predator Yankee Protestants—and you get asymptotically close to them. Philip Roth nailed this in the first hundred pages of American Pastoral. (Another book to consult to understand the grizzly reality underneath the Kennedy myth would be Dominick Dunne’s A Season in Purgatory, the most morally scathing beach read in American letters.)Why has this farce lingered in the political realm? The Kennedys elected to high office have a spotty record of actual accomplishment—one that has gotten thinner as time has gone on. For every stirring speech, there was the Bay of Pigs. Ted Kennedy’s long list of legislative wins could never quite make up for the fact that he left a woman to drown. Patrick Kennedy and Joseph P. Kennedy III were empty suits. The answer for their longevity is simple: Democrats are as susceptible to nostalgia as Republicans. The assassination of JFK marked a stark dividing line in American political life—there was always a suggestion that things could have been better had he lived, a possibility brought to rich fictional life in Stephen King’s 11/22/63, which imagines a time traveler who gets to experience the world where JFK lived. (That hypothetical world is destroyed in a nuclear holocaust.) Still, the idea has always been that the Kennedy family represents an elegance and grace—and hope—that has not been present in American politics since JFK’s assassination.Love Story and the most recent waves of Kennedy politicians are copies of a copy of a copy. Their political positions are all aura. The Kennedy family is profoundly wealthy and well connected—but what do they stand for? The politeness and glad-handing of the Kennedy family is about as helpful at this point as “In This House We Believe” posters that dot front lawns from Belmont to Presidio Heights. And past those front lawns, inside those homes, under the wan blue light of the family iPad is Love Story.We’re dealing with two specimens of the Kennedy legacy today. Each represents the worst of the two majority political parties.In a proper world, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. would be a family-money kook in East Hampton trying to sell encapsulated swordfish liver and talking about how Incans invented Wi-Fi. But online wellness cults, and the legitimacy of his early career work as an environmental lawyer, and the familial belief that being a Kennedy means you should be in charge of people, have been rocket fuel in the heart of a deeply troubled man. As head of the Health and Human Services Department, he has broken with a century of progress in reducing child mortality and profound human suffering because he’s the drum major for the anti-vaccine movement. Mock him for his workouts in jeans—and his abysmal form on squats—if you want, but his legacy will be clear: dead kids whose families trusted him because of his last name. He is a fine avatar for the Trump administration’s embrace of raw celebrity power and detachment from objective reality.From another well-heeled zip code comes featherweight zillennial flaneur Jack Schlossberg, son of Caroline (a supporting player in Love Story played capably by Meryl Streep’s daughter Grace Gummer), grandson of JFK, primary candidate for New York’s 12th congressional district, and cringe meme made flesh. He’s a Yale and Harvard grad (obviously) with work experience that doesn’t extend much further than a brief stint at Vogue and a cameo on Blue Bloods. He couldn’t even help himself during a Times profile by Maureen Dowd in which he tiptoed around Gaza—as potent an issue as exists with voters under 30—took a couple shots at his uncle RFK Jr., and paddleboarded. Representative Jerry Nadler, the man Schlossberg is running to replace, dismissed Schlossberg’s candidacy and his total lack of a public service record. Good. One imagines a future in which this young man comes to his senses, climbs the ladder at Paul Weiss, cuts some checks to Teach for America and the Whitney, and calls it a life of service.What is the point? The Kennedy name is there—that’s all you really need to know. And that alone is meant to handwave all the other questions about what precisely the Democratic Party is and should be. The implication has, for decades, been that the possession of that name makes everything else immaterial. A Kennedy doesn’t have to prove his credentials. So Love Story is a case study and a curio for how the contemporary mainstream of the Democratic Party is out of touch with both today’s political climate and its own history. Like America at large, it subsists off a myth decades past its expiration date at its own peril. The Kennedy family climbed the ladder, had a few charismatic public speakers, suffered mightily—as millions of other American families have. But what do they have to offer now? The so-called “No Kings” protests have gotten Democrats and liberals and progressives into the street to protest the avarice and sloppy authoritarian reach of the Trump administration. But while we are on the subject of Americans who imagine themselves as royal, it would be nice if the Democratic Party could look inside its own house, recognize the family that’s been playing footsie with the fantasy of Camelot for a while now, and move on.
Trump Sending Troops to the Gulf Despite Claiming He Wants a Deal
If Donald Trump says he’s ready for peace with Iran, why is the Pentagon planning to deploy thousands of troops from the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East?The Department of Defense is plotting to deploy 3,000 members of the U.S. Army’s 82nd Airborne Division, two U.S. officials told The Wall Street Journal. The orders are expected to be signed Tuesday afternoon.While the decision to put boots on the ground has not been made, the officials told the Journal, deploying the elite, rapid-response paratrooper division does expand the range of options Trump can take in Iran. The decision comes just days after Trump announced that the U.S had held “productive talks” with Iranian officials moving closer to a “complete and total resolution of our hostilities in the Middle East, with a five-day pause on strikes against energy infrastructure.Iranian officials have denied that the country is in talks with the United States, and some have speculated Trump’s announcement was merely an attempt at market manipulation. At the same time, Israel launched fresh attacks on Tehran Monday despite Trump’s gesture at peace.The 82nd Airborne Division, comprising up to 5,000 soldiers, specializes in missions that include parachute assault, reinforcing U.S. embassies, and enabling emergency evacuations. Earlier this month, the U.S. Army spontaneously canceled a training exercise for the elite division, sparking concerns that they would be deployed to the Middle East. It seems now that those concerns were well-founded.
Fetterman gets another potential Democratic challenger
Former Rep. Susan Wild is getting encouraged to run against the Pennsylvania senator, a person familiar with her thinking told Semafor.
Gavin Newsom Says He “Reveres the State of Israel,” Regrets Apartheid Label
If Netanyahu continues down this path, apartheid is “a word you may hear others use,” the California governor said.
Trump ha detenido a padres de más de 11,000 niños ciudadanos estadounidenses
The post Trump ha detenido a padres de más de 11,000 niños ciudadanos estadounidenses appeared first on ProPublica.
Iran War Still An Apocalyptic Farce + East Palestine, Poison & You
Trump Says He Changed His Mind After Iran Gave “Very Big Present”
President Trump took questions after Markwayne Mullin was confirmed as homeland security secretary on Tuesday, and dropped a strange detail about the ongoing negotiations to end the war in Iran.After a journalist asked Trump why he would bother trying to negotiate with Iran if, as the president has claimed, he doesn’t trust their leadership, Trump replied:“Because they’re going to make a deal. They did something yesterday that was amazing, actually. They gave us a present. And the present arrived today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money. And I’m not going to tell you what that present is, but it was a very significant prize.… That meant one thing to me—we’re dealing with the right people.” Trump on Iran: They gave us a present today. And it was a very big present worth a tremendous amount of money and I'm not going to tell you what that present is but it was a very significant prize. It said to me that we are dealing with the right people. pic.twitter.com/46eMS6cWN5— Acyn (@Acyn) March 24, 2026It is simultaneously funny and depressing to hear that Iranian leaders have realized they can essentially just bribe Trump with an expensive gift. It’s a similar strategy to that recently employed by María Corina Machado, the Venezuelan opposition leader who presented her Nobel Peace Prize to Trump in January, sparking allegations that she was trying to curry favor with the president. (Trump was thrilled by the gift but later snubbed Machado anyway.)Reporters prodded Trump about what the present was. The president wouldn’t say exactly but hinted that it “was oil and gas related” and “related to the flow, and to the Strait [of Hormuz].” Perhaps an agreement giving Trump and his cronies exclusive access to an oil field?Negotiations to end the war have gotten off to a rocky start. After Trump claimed on Monday that Iran and the U.S. had held “productive conversations regarding a complete and total resolution of our hostilities,” Iranian officials came out and said the talks had never happened.Despite the fact that U.S. and Israeli strikes on Iran are very much ongoing, as is Iranian retaliation, Trump also claimed in his remarks that the “war has been won” and “the only one that likes to keep it going is the fake news.”
Judge Orders Trump to Bring Back Deported DACA Mom ASAP
The Trump administration suffered another loss in court after a federal judge ordered them to bring a Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals recipient they deported to Mexico while she was in the process of applying for lawful permanent residency.Maria de Jesus Estrada Juarez came to the U.S. from Mexico in 1998 when she was 15 years old and received DACA protection in 2013. Last month, the Sacramento, California, resident showed up at an immigration hearing with her 22-year-old U.S. citizen daughter, only to be greeted by federal agents, detained, and deported.But on Monday, U.S. District Judge Dena Coggins declared Juarez’s deportation unlawful and demanded that the Trump administration return her to the United States by March 30, calling it a “flagrant violation of the regulatory protections afforded to her under DACA.”“It is difficult to argue that Petitioner’s removal constitutes anything less than an ‘extreme circumstance,’” Coggins wrote in her order. “Less than 24 hours after Petitioner’s good faith appearance to pursue lawful permanent resident status in this country — she was removed to a nation where she had not lived in over 27 years pursuant to an order purportedly entered against her when she was fifteen years old.”The Justice Department claims that Juarez’s DACA status did not exclude her from deportation, while the Department of Homeland Security has yet to publicly comment. In the past, DHS has tried to argue that DACA status is not protection from deportation, even though the status of the program is tied up in court.
Headlines
(6,381) 6,381 headlinesPage 1 of 639